Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28068059›Full record

ReviewACS chemical biology2017

Subcellular Redox Targeting: Bridging in Vitro and in Vivo Chemical Biology.

Marcus J C Long, Jesse R Poganik, Souradyuti Ghosh, Yimon Aye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS chemical biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Getting the Message? Native Reactive Electrophiles Pass Two Out of Three Thresholds to be Bona Fide Signaling Mediators.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Nanoparticle-Cell Interactions: Relevance for Public Health.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. DirectRedox biology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcus J C LongDepartment of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York 14850, United States.
Jesse R PoganikDepartment of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York 14850, United States.
Souradyuti GhoshDepartment of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York 14850, United States.
Yimon AyeDepartment of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York 14850, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1256-4159

Funding

CHEMISTRY OF BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMST32GM008500 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI LIN, HENING · 1996 to 2020
$5.4M
Deconvoluting Redox Biology with Targeted ChemistryDP2GM114850 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI AYE, YIMON · 2014 to 2014
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM114850NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Networks of redox sensor proteins within discrete microdomains regulate the flow of redox signaling. Yet, the inherent reactivity of redox signals complicates the study of specific redox events and pathways by traditional methods. Herein, we review designer chemistries capable of measuring flux and/or mimicking subcellular redox signaling at the cellular and organismal level. Such efforts have begun to decipher the logic underlying organelle-, site-, and target-specific redox signaling in vitro and in vivo. These data highlight chemical biology as a perfect gateway to interrogate how nature choreographs subcellular redox chemistry to drive precision redox biology.

Indexed as

In Vitro TechniquesOxidation-ReductionReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionSubcellular FractionsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID28068059
PMCPMC5592730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.