ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2017
Assessment of acute thermal damage volumes in muscle using magnetization-prepared 3D T
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolution of non-perfused volume after transurethral ultrasound ablation of prostate: A retrospective 12-month analysis.European journal of radiology open · 2023Article
- Deep learning prediction of non-perfused volume without contrast agents during prostate ablation therapy.Biomedical engineering letters · 2023Article
- A Review of Imaging Methods to Assess Ultrasound-Mediated Ablation.BME frontiers · 2022Article
- Assessing high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of prostate cancer with hyperpolarizedNMR in biomedicine · 2019Article
- Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for monitoring tissue change during magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy in bone applications: anEuropean radiology experimental · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate magnetization-prepared 3D T MATERIALS AND
methodsA clinical MR-HIFU system (3T) was used to generate thermal lesions (n = 24) in the skeletal muscles of three pigs. T
resultsLesion dimensions on T
conclusionAfter MR-HIFU exposures, measurements of the acute thermal damage patterns in muscle using a magnetization-prepared 3D T LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2017;46:354-364.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.