Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28067883›Full record

ReviewBone marrow transplantation2017

Clinical management of genital chronic GvHD.

B K Hamilton, O Goje, B N Savani, N S Majhail, P Stratton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Bone marrow transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Uterine relapse of Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Development of a Pediatric Fertility Preservation Program: A Report From the Pediatric Initiative Network of the Oncofertility Consortium.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2019
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B K HamiltonBlood &Marrow Transplant Program, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
O GojeObstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
B N SavaniDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
N S MajhailBlood &Marrow Transplant Program, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
P StrattonOffice of the Clinical Director, Intramural Program, National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic GvHD (cGvHD) of the genital tract is an underreported and infrequently recognized complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in both male and female long-term survivors. Its pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and management are not well understood, and studies are limited. We thus provide a comprehensive review of genital cGvHD in both men and women, as well as discuss related issues of sexual health and viral reactivation. We further provide guidance on screening, management and long-term follow-up, as well as future priority areas of study.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAllograftsChronic DiseaseFemaleGenital Diseases, FemaleGenital Diseases, MaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID28067883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.