ArticleNutrients2017
Content Validation and Semantic Evaluation of a Check-List Elaborated for the Prevention of Gluten Cross-Contamination in Food Services.
Article in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Construction and Content Validation of Mobile Devices' Application Messages about Food and Nutrition for DM2 Older Adults.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Celiac Disease: Risks of Cross-Contamination and Strategies for Gluten Removal in Food Environments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Review
- Eating Competence Associated with Food Consumption and Health Outcomes among Brazilian Adult Population.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Evaluation of Quality of Life of Adult Patients with Celiac Disease in Argentina: From Questionnaire Validation to Assessment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Accidental Gluten Contamination in Traditional Lunch Meals from Food Services in Brasilia, Brazil.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Self-Reported Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity in Brazil: Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Italian Questionnaire.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Good Practices in Home Kitchens: Construction and Validation of an Instrument for Household Food-Borne Disease Assessment and Prevention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Food Trucks: Assessment of an Evaluation Instrument Designed for the Prevention of Foodborne Diseases.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Development of a Brazilian Food Truck Risk Assessment Instrument.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Gluten-Free Diet: From Development to Assessment of a Check-List Designed for the Prevention of Gluten Cross-Contamination in Food Services.Nutrients · 2018Article
- Quality of Life of Celiac Patients in Brazil: Questionnaire Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation.Nutrients · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conditions associated to the consumption of gluten have emerged as a major health care concern and the treatment consists on a lifelong gluten-free diet. Providing safe food for these individuals includes adapting to safety procedures within the food chain and preventing gluten cross-contamination in gluten-free food. However, a gluten cross-contamination prevention protocol or check-list has not yet been validated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perform the content validation and semantic evaluation of a check-list elaborated for the prevention of gluten cross-contamination in food services. The preliminary version of the check-list was elaborated based on the Brazilian resolution for food safety
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.