Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28067278›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Development of a Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay for Detection of Epidemic Human Noroviruses.

Matthew D Moore, Lee-Ann Jaykus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Enhanced Specificity in Colorimetric LAMP Assay forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rapid detection ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Viral Eco-Genomic Tools: Development and Implementation for Aquatic Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew D MooreDepartment of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, 315 Schaub Hall, 400 Dan Allen Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States of America.
Lee-Ann JaykusDepartment of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, 315 Schaub Hall, 400 Dan Allen Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human norovirus is a leading cause of viral gastroenteritis worldwide. Rapid detection could facilitate control, however widespread point-of-care testing is infrequently done due to the lack of robust and portable methods. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is a novel isothermal method which rapidly amplifies and detects nucleic acids using a simple device in near real-time. An RT-RPA assay targeting a recent epidemic human norovirus strain (GII.4 New Orleans) was developed and evaluated in this study. The assay successfully detected purified norovirus RNA from multiple patient outbreak isolates and had a limit of detection of 3.40 ± 0.20 log

Indexed as

Caliciviridae InfectionsEpidemicsHumansNorovirusReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRecombinasesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRecombinases

Identifiers

PMID28067278
PMCPMC5220337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.