Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28066872›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2017

Comparative genomics and expression levels of hydrophobins from eight mycorrhizal genomes.

F Rineau, H Lmalem, D Ahren, F Shah, T Johansson, L Coninx, J Ruytinx, H Nguyen, I Grigoriev, A Kuo and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

F RineauCentre for Environmental Sciences, Environmental Biology group, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium. francois.rineau@uhasselt.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-6184
H LmalemCentre for Environmental Sciences, Environmental Biology group, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
D AhrenDepartment of Biology, Microbial Ecology Group, Lund University, Ecology Building, 223 62, Lund, SE, Sweden.
F ShahDepartment of food and environmental sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
T JohanssonDepartment of Biology, Microbial Ecology Group, Lund University, Ecology Building, 223 62, Lund, SE, Sweden.
L ConinxCentre for Environmental Sciences, Environmental Biology group, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
J RuytinxCentre for Environmental Sciences, Environmental Biology group, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
H NguyenCentre for Environmental Sciences, Environmental Biology group, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
I GrigorievUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (JGI), Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
A KuoUS Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (JGI), Walnut Creek, CA, USA.
A KohlerLaboratory of Excellence Advanced Research on the Biology of Tree and Forest Ecosystems (ARBRE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), UMR 1136, Champenoux, France.
E MorinLaboratory of Excellence Advanced Research on the Biology of Tree and Forest Ecosystems (ARBRE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), UMR 1136, Champenoux, France.
J VangronsveldCentre for Environmental Sciences, Environmental Biology group, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
F MartinLaboratory of Excellence Advanced Research on the Biology of Tree and Forest Ecosystems (ARBRE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), UMR 1136, Champenoux, France.
J V ColpaertCentre for Environmental Sciences, Environmental Biology group, UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrophobins are small secreted proteins that are present as several gene copies in most fungal genomes. Their properties are now well understood: they are amphiphilic and assemble at hydrophilic/hydrophobic interfaces. However, their physiological functions remain largely unexplored, especially within mycorrhizal fungi. In this study, we identified hydrophobin genes and analysed their distribution in eight mycorrhizal genomes. We then measured their expression levels in three different biological conditions (mycorrhizal tissue vs. free-living mycelium, organic vs. mineral growth medium and aerial vs. submerged growth). Results confirmed that the size of the hydrophobin repertoire increased in the terminal orders of the fungal evolutionary tree. Reconciliation analysis predicted that in 41% of the cases, hydrophobins evolved from duplication events. Whatever the treatment and the fungal species, the pattern of expression of hydrophobins followed a reciprocal function, with one gene much more expressed than others from the same repertoire. These most-expressed hydrophobin genes were also among the most expressed of the whole genome, which suggests that they play a role as structural proteins. The fine-tuning of the expression of hydrophobin genes in each condition appeared complex because it differed considerably between species, in a way that could not be explained by simple ecological traits. Hydrophobin gene regulation in mycorrhizal tissue as compared with free-living mycelium, however, was significantly associated with a calculated high exposure of hydrophilic residues.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenome, FungalFungal ProteinsGenomicsMyceliumMycorrhizaeFungal ProteinsComparative genomicsHydrophobinsMycorrhizasSmall secreted proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.