Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28066825›Full record

ArticleWellcome open research2016

A blinded randomised placebo-controlled trial investigating the efficacy of morphine analgesia for procedural pain in infants: Trial protocol.

Rebeccah Slater, Caroline Hartley, Fiona Moultrie, Eleri Adams, Ed Juszczak, Richard Rogers, Jane E Norman, Chetan Patel, Kayleigh Stanbury, Amy Hoskin and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wellcome open research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06067958 (Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Pain Management During Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06067958 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Pain Management During Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity: a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssaf-Harofeh Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsRetinopathy of Prematurity, DexmedetomidineArmsDexmedetomidine, Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Opioids for procedural pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  7. Opioids for procedural pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  8. Nociception and the neonatal brain.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Improving the treatment of infant pain.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Rebeccah SlaterDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1595-4846
Caroline HartleyDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Fiona MoultrieDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Eleri AdamsDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ed JuszczakNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Richard RogersNuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Jane E NormanMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Chetan PatelOxford Eye Hospital, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Kayleigh StanburyNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit (NPEU), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Amy HoskinDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gabrielle GreenDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Poppi Trial Team
Délégation Paris 5 · FRErasmus Hospital · BEJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15110Wellcome Trust 095802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infant pain has both immediate and long-term negative consequences, yet in clinical practice it is often undertreated. To date, few pain-relieving drugs have been tested in infants. Morphine is a potent analgesic that provides effective pain relief in adults, but there is inconclusive evidence for its effectiveness in infants. The purpose of this study is to establish whether oral morphine provides effective analgesia for procedural pain in infants. A blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomized, phase II, clinical trial will be undertaken to determine whether morphine sulphate administered orally prior to clinically-required retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening and heel lancing provides effective analgesia. 
156 infants between 34 and 42 weeks' gestational age who require a clinical heel lance and ROP screening on the same test occasion will be included in the trial. Infants will be randomised to receive either a single dose of morphine sulphate (100 μg/kg) or placebo. Each infant will be monitored for 48 hours and safety data will be collected during the 24 hours following drug administration. The primary outcome will be the Premature Infant Pain Profile-revised (PIPP-R) score 30 seconds after ROP screening. The co-primary outcome will be the magnitude of nociceptive-specific brain activity evoked by a clinically-required heel lance. Infant clinical stability will be assessed by comparing the number of episodes of bradycardia, tachycardia, desaturation and apnoea, and changes in respiratory support requirements in the 24-hour periods before and after the clinical intervention. In addition, drug safety will be assessed by considering the occurrence of apnoeic and hypotensive episodes requiring intervention in the 24-hour period following drug administration. This study has been published as an

Indexed as

AnalgesiaBrainEEGInfantMorphinePainRetinopathy of Prematurity

Identifiers

PMID28066825
PMCPMC5218543
OpenAlexW2552840244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.