Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28066805›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2016

Evaluation of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Wei Huang, Brooke R Beckett, Alina Tudorica, Janelle M Meyer, Aneela Afzal, Yiyi Chen, Atiya Mansoor, James B Hayden, Yee-Cheen Doung, Arthur Y Hung and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TThe Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wei HuangAdvanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Brooke R BeckettDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Alina TudoricaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Janelle M MeyerDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Aneela AfzalAdvanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Yiyi ChenKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Atiya MansoorDepartment of Pathology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
James B HaydenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Yee-Cheen DoungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Arthur Y HungDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Megan L HoltorfKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Torrie J AstonKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Christopher W RyanKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

Understanding the origins of rapid recurrence of pancreatic cancer after resectionP30CA069533 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Grace B Gill · 1997 to 2026
$60.5M
Shutter-Speed Model DCE-MRI for Assessment of Response to Cancer TherapyU01CA154602 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, WEI, RYAN, CHRISTOPHER WALTER · 2011 to 2015
$2.9M
Commercialization of the Shutter-Speed Model for Dynamic MRI in Cancer DiagnosisR44CA180425 · NCI · IMBIO, LLC · PI KEITH, LAUREN · 2013 to 2016
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA069533NCI NIH HHS R44 CA180425NCI NIH HHS U01 CA154602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to assess the utility of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in comparison with imaging tumor size for early prediction and evaluation of soft tissue sarcoma response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. In total, 20 patients with intermediate- to high-grade soft tissue sarcomas received either a phase I trial regimen of sorafenib + chemoradiotherapy (n = 8) or chemoradiotherapy only (n = 12), and underwent DCE-MRI at baseline, after 2 weeks of treatment with sorafenib or after the first chemotherapy cycle, and after therapy completion. MRI tumor size in the longest diameter (LD) was measured according to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) guidelines. Pharmacokinetic analyses of DCE-MRI data were performed using the Shutter-Speed model. After only 2 weeks of treatment with sorafenib or after 1 chemotherapy cycle, K

Indexed as

DCE-MRIpharmacokinetic modelingShutter-Speed modelsoft tissue sarcomatherapy response

Identifiers

PMID28066805
PMCPMC5215747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.