Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28066801›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2016

Cell assisted lipotransfer in breast augmentation and reconstruction: A systematic review of safety, efficacy, use of patient reported outcomes and study quality.

Zeeshaan Arshad, Lindsey Karmen, Rajan Choudhary, James A Smith, Olivier A Branford, David A Brindley, David Pettitt, Benjamin M Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Autologous fat grafting: Latest insights.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zeeshaan ArshadSchool of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, North Haugh, UK; The Oxford - UCL Centre for the Advancement of Sustainable Medical Innovation (CASMI), The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lindsey KarmenSchool of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, North Haugh, UK.
Rajan ChoudharySchool of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
James A SmithNuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK; The Oxford - UCL Centre for the Advancement of Sustainable Medical Innovation (CASMI), The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Olivier A BranfordThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
David A BrindleyThe Oxford - UCL Centre for the Advancement of Sustainable Medical Innovation (CASMI), The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Said Business School, University of Oxford, Park End Street, Oxford, UK; Centre for Behavioral Medicine, UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, Brunswick Square, London, UK; Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA, USA; USCF-Stanford Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI), 4th Street, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Oxford, Headley Way, UK.
David PettittThe Oxford - UCL Centre for the Advancement of Sustainable Medical Innovation (CASMI), The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Pediatrics, University of Oxford, Headley Way, UK.
Benjamin M DaviesNuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK; The Oxford - UCL Centre for the Advancement of Sustainable Medical Innovation (CASMI), The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell assisted lipotransfer serves as a novel technique for both breast reconstruction and breast augmentation. This systematic review assesses the efficacy, safety and use of patient reported outcome measures in studies involving cell assisted lipotransfer. We also carry out an objective assessment of study quality focussing on recruitment, follow-up and provide an up-to-date clinical trial landscaping analysis.

methodsKey electronic databases were searched according to PRISMA guidelines and pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers examined the retrieved publications and performed data extraction.

results3980 publications were identified. Following screening, 11 studies were included for full review, representing a total of 336 patients with a follow-up time ranging from six to 42 months. A degree of variation was noted in graft retention and reported satisfaction levels, although there were only three comparative studies with conflicting results. Complications occurred at a rate of 37%. Additionally, there was a paucity of objective outcomes assessments (e.g. 3D assessment modalities or validated patient reported outcome measures) in the selected studies.

conclusionsCell assisted lipotransfer is a surgical technique that is currently employed sparingly within the plastic & reconstructive surgery community. Presently, further technical and outcome standardization is required, in addition to rigorous randomized controlled trials and supporting long-term follow-up data to better determine procedural safety and efficacy. Routine use of more objective outcome measures, particularly 3D assessments and validated patient reported outcome measures, will also help facilitate wider clinical adoption and establish procedural utility.

Indexed as

Adipose derived stem cellsBreast augmentationBreast reconstructionCell assisted lipotransferStromal vascular fraction

Identifiers

PMID28066801
PMCPMC5193151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.