ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2016
Detecting and segmenting cell nuclei in two-dimensional microscopy images.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-based tumor cellularity assessment in digital pathology: A review of methods, datasets, and clinical translation.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Quantifying Nuclear Structures of Digital Pathology Images Across Cancers Using Transport-Based Morphometry.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2025Article
- Cluster Analysis of Cell Nuclei in H&E-Stained Histological Sections of Prostate Cancer and Classification Based on Traditional and Modern Artificial Intelligence Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A live imaging system to analyze spatiotemporal dynamics of RNA polymerase II modification in Arabidopsis thaliana.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Automated and Manual Quantification of Tumour Cellularity in Digital Slides for Tumour Burden Assessment.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Comparative Study on Automated Cell Nuclei Segmentation Methods for Cytology Pleural Effusion Images.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2018Article
- Robust Cell Detection for Large-Scale 3D Microscopy Using GPU-Accelerated Iterative Voting.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2018Article
- Automatic cellularity assessment from post-treated breast surgical specimens.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2017Article
- Predictive Nuclear Chromatin Characteristics of Melanoma and Dysplastic Nevi.Journal of pathology informatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCell nuclei are important indicators of cellular processes and diseases. Segmentation is an essential stage in systems for quantitative analysis of nuclei extracted from microscopy images. Given the wide variety of nuclei appearance in different organs and staining procedures, a plethora of methods have been described in the literature to improve the segmentation accuracy and robustness. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this paper, we propose an unsupervised method for cell nuclei detection and segmentation in two-dimensional microscopy images. The nuclei in the image are detected automatically using a matching-based method. Next, edge maps are generated at multiple image blurring levels followed by edge selection performed in polar space. The nuclei contours are refined iteratively in the constructed edge pyramid. The validation study was conducted over two cell nuclei datasets with manual labeling, including 25 hematoxylin and eosin-stained liver histopathology images and 35 Papanicolaou-stained thyroid images.
resultsThe nuclei detection accuracy was measured by miss rate, and the segmentation accuracy was evaluated by two types of error metrics. Overall, the nuclei detection efficiency of the proposed method is similar to the supervised template matching method. In comparison to four existing state-of-the-art segmentation methods, the proposed method performed the best with average segmentation error 10.34% and 0.33 measured by area error rate and normalized sum of distances (×10).
conclusionQuantitative analysis showed that the method is automatic and accurate when segmenting cell nuclei from microscopy images with noisy background and has the potential to be used in clinic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.