Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28066600›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2016

White light, autofluorescence and narrow-band imaging bronchoscopy for diagnosing airway pre-cancerous and early cancer lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jianrong Zhang, Jieyu Wu, Yujing Yang, Hua Liao, Zhiheng Xu, Lindsey Tristine Hamblin, Long Jiang, Lieven Depypere, Keng Leong Ang, Jiaxi He and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Automatic lesion detection for narrow-band imaging bronchoscopy.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Comparison of narrow-band imaging with autofluorescence imaging for endoscopic detection of squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Interventional Pulmonology: A Brave New World.Thoracic surgery clinics · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The technique of endoscopic airway tumor treatment.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jianrong ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;; China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; National Clinical Research Centre of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; Graduate School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Jieyu WuGraduate School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;; Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Yujing YangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences and General Hospital, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Hua LiaoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Zhiheng XuChina State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; National Clinical Research Centre of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; Graduate School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;; Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Lindsey Tristine HamblinInstitute of International Education, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Long JiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;; China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; National Clinical Research Centre of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; Graduate School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Lieven DepypereDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Keng Leong AngDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK.
Jiaxi HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;; China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; National Clinical Research Centre of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; Graduate School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Ziyan LiangDepartment of Neonatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Jun HuangMedical Equipment Section, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Jingpei LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;; China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; National Clinical Research Centre of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Qihua HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;; China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; National Clinical Research Centre of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; Graduate School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Wenhua LiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;; China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; National Clinical Research Centre of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Jianxing HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China;; China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China;; National Clinical Research Centre of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to summarize the diagnostic accuracy of white light bronchoscopy (WLB) and advanced techniques for airway pre-cancerous lesions and early cancer, such as autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB), AFB combined with WLB (AFB + WLB) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) bronchoscopy.

methodsWe searched for eligible studies in seven electronic databases from their date of inception to Mar 20, 2015. In eligible studies, detected lesions should be confirmed by histopathology. We extracted and calculated the 2×2 data based on the pathological criteria of lung tumor, including high-grade lesions from moderate dysplasia (MOD) to invasive carcinoma (INV). Random-effect model was used to pool sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsIn 53 eligible studies (39 WLB, 39 AFB, 17 AFB + WLB, 6 NBI), diagnostic performance for high-grade lesions was analyzed based on twelve studies (10 WLB, 7 AFB, 7 AFB + WLB, 1 NBI), involving with totally 2,880 patients and 8,830 biopsy specimens. The sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC of WLB were 51% (95% CI, 34-68%), 86% (95% CI, 73-84%), 6 (95% CI, 3-13) and 77% (95% CI, 73-81%). Those of AFB and AFB + WLB were 93% (95% CI, 77-98%) and 86% (95% CI, 75-97%), 52% (95% CI, 37-67%) and 71% (95% CI, 56-87%), 15 (95% CI, 4-57) and 16 (95% CI, 6-41), and 76% (95% CI, 72-79%) and 82% (95% CI, 78-85%), respectively. NBI presented 100% sensitivity and 43% specificity.

conclusionsWith higher sensitivity, advanced bronchoscopy could be valuable to avoid missed diagnosis. Combining strategy of AFB and WLB may contribute preferable diagnosis rather than their alone use for high-grade lesions. Studies of NBI warrants further investigation for precancerous lesions.

Indexed as

Advanced bronchoscopyautofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB)lung cancernarrow-band imaging bronchoscopywhite light bronchoscopy (WLB)

Identifiers

PMID28066600
PMCPMC5179382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.