Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28066532›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2017

Matched Molecular Pair Analysis in Short: Algorithms, Applications and Limitations.

Christian Tyrchan, Emma Evertsson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Perspective on Explanations of Molecular Prediction Models.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christian TyrchanDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, RIA iMed, AstraZeneca R&D, Pepparedsleden 1, S-431 83 Mölndal, Sweden.
Emma EvertssonDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, RIA iMed, AstraZeneca R&D, Pepparedsleden 1, S-431 83 Mölndal, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular matched pair (MMP) analysis has been used for more than 40 years within molecular design and is still an important tool to analyse potency data and other compound properties. The methods used to find matched pairs range from manual inspection, through supervised methods to unsupervised methods, which are able to find previously unknown molecular pairs. Recent publications demonstrate the value of automatic MMP analysis of publicly available bioactivity databases. The MMP concept has its limitations, but because of its easy to use and intuitive nature, it will remain one of the most important tools in the toolbox of many drug designers.

Identifiers

PMID28066532
PMCPMC5198793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.