ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2016
Genetic Modulation of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Cognition.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of variance in tDCS effects on response inhibition.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Acute effects of single dose transcranial direct current stimulation on muscle strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- The influence of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism on prefrontal TDCS effects on aggression.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Inter-individual differences in baseline dynamic functional connectivity are linked to cognitive aftereffects of tDCS.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Noninvasive neuromodulation of the prefrontal cortex in young women with obesity: a randomized clinical trial.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2020Trial
- Transcranial direct current stimulation to improve cognitive function in patients with vascular cognitive impairment: a literature review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- When genetics prevail: brain stimulation fails to overcome learning deficits from brain-derived neurotrophic factorClinical neurophysiology practice · 2025Article
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in neurogenetic syndromes: new treatment perspectives for Down syndrome?Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Article
- Early- and late-phase changes of brain activity and early-phase neuromodulation in the posttraumatic stress disorder rat model.Neurobiology of stress · 2023Article
- Neurobiological regulation of eating behavior: Evidence based on non-invasive brain stimulation.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2022Review
- Comparing amplitudes of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the sensorimotor cortex during swallowing.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Dynamic DNA Methylation Changes in theBiomolecules · 2021Article
- Treatment of major depressive disorder with bilateral theta burst stimulation: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial (TBS-D).European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2021Article
- Brain Circuits Involved in the Development of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Evidence From Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Val66Met polymorphism interacts with adolescent stress to alter hippocampal interneuron density and dendritic morphology in mice.Neurobiology of stress · 2020Article
- Auditory cognitive training improves prepulse inhibition in serine racemase mutant mice.Psychopharmacology · 2020Article
- Dopaminergic modulation of the exploration/exploitation trade-off in human decision-making.eLife · 2020Article
- Predicting Working Memory Training Benefits From Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Using Resting-State fMRI.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Reward motivation and neurostimulation interact to improve working memory performance in healthy older adults: A simultaneous tDCS-fNIRS study.NeuroImage · 2019Article
- The COMT ValThe European journal of neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High inter-individual variability substantially challenges the explanatory power of studies on the modulation of cognitive functions with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). These differences in responsivity have been linked with a critical state-dependency of stimulation effects. In general, genetic diversity is a decisive biological basis of variations in neuronal network functioning. Therefore, it is most likely that inter-individual variability of tDCS-induced changes in cognitive functions is due to specific interactions between genetically determined network properties and the specific type of stimulation. In this context, predominantly the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) Val66Met and the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val108/158Met polymorphisms have been investigated. The studies on the interaction between the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and the effect of brain stimulation indicate a critical but yet heterogeneous interaction. But up to now, data on the interplay between this polymorphism and tDCS on cognitive functioning are not available. However, recently, the functional Val(108/158)Met polymorphism in the COMT gene, that is particularly involved in the regulation of executive functions by means of the dopaminergic tone in frontal brain areas, has been demonstrated to specifically predict the effect of tDCS on cognitive control. Following an inverted U-shaped function, the high dopaminergic activity in Met allele homozygous individuals has been shown to be associated with a reduction of executive functioning by anodal tDCS to the prefrontal cortex. Consistently, Val homozygous individuals with lower dopaminergic tone show a clear reduction of response inhibition with cathodal tDCS. These findings exemplify the notion of a complex but neurophysiologically consistent interaction between genetically determined variations of neuronal activity and tDCS, particularly in the cognitive domain. Consequently, a systematic analysis and consideration of genetic modulators of tDCS effects will be helpful to improve the efficacy of brain stimulation and particularly tDCS in the investigation and treatment of cognitive functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.