Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28066101›Full record

Trial reportIndian journal of pharmacology

Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of montelukast-levocetirizine and montelukast-fexofenadine in patients of allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Mohini Sachin Mahatme, Ganesh Natthuji Dakhale, Kanchan Tadke, Sachin Keshaorao Hiware, S D Dudhgaonkar, Sumit Wankhede

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indian journal of pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Efficacy of Tuomin Zhiti Decoction in Allergic Rhinitis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohini Sachin MahatmeDepartment of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Ganesh Natthuji DakhaleDepartment of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Kanchan TadkeDepartment of ENT, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Sachin Keshaorao HiwareDepartment of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
S D DudhgaonkarDepartment of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Sumit WankhedeDepartment of Pharmacology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Government Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAllergic rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem. Almost 10%-25% of population worldwide is affected by AR. Oral/intranasal H1-antihistamine, decongestants, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and intranasal corticosteroids are the pillars in the management of AR. The combination therapy of montelukast with antihistaminic provides enhancing and complimentary effects, thereby reducing the symptoms effectively, but there are scanty data regarding the comparisons of combinations. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of montelukast-levocetirizine and montelukast-fexofenadine combination in patients of AR. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy patients with AR participated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, comparative 4-week trial. The patients between the age group of 18-65 years of either gender having moderate-severe intermittent or mild persistent AR were included in the study. The study inclusion criteria required the patients with total nasal symptom score (TNSS) of 5 or higher. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups with montelukast-levocetirizine (10 mg and 5 mg) in one group and montelukast-fexofenadine (10 mg and 120 mg) in another group. TNSS parameter was the main effectiveness parameter.

resultsEvaluation of TNSS revealed significant difference (

conclusionThe decrease in TNSS was more in montelukast-fexofenadine group, but the cost-effectiveness is more with montelukast-levocetirizine combination.

Indexed as

AcetatesAnti-Allergic AgentsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsCetirizineCost-Benefit AnalysisCyclopropanesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProspective StudiesQuinolinesRhinitis, AllergicSulfidesAcetatesAnti-Allergic AgentsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsCetirizineCyclopropanesfexofenadinelevocetirizinemontelukastQuinolinesSulfidesTerfenadineAllergic rhinitiscost-effectivenessfexofenadinelevocetirizinemontelukast

Identifiers

PMID28066101
PMCPMC5155464
OpenAlexW2558599802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.