Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28066067›Full record

SynthesisTransactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association2016

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF AN EPIGENETIC ASSAY TO PREDICT MISSED CANCER IN PROSTATE BIOPSY SPECIMENS.

Alan W Partin, Wim VAN Criekinge, Bruce J Trock, Jonathan I Epstein, Leander VAN Neste

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alan W PartinBALTIMORE, MARYLAND.
Wim VAN CriekingeBALTIMORE, MARYLAND.
Bruce J TrockBALTIMORE, MARYLAND.
Jonathan I EpsteinBALTIMORE, MARYLAND.
Leander VAN NesteBALTIMORE, MARYLAND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 1 million prostate biopsies are performed yearly in the United States, with only ~25% resulting in prostate cancer diagnosis. However, ~40% of men receive multiple biopsies for fear of cancer being missed. DNA hypermethylation is ideally suited for early disease detection and could be used to prevent unnecessary biopsies. Men with low-risk epigenetic signatures may forego subsequent biopsy and potential complications. A meta-analysis of two validation studies was conducted to gain additional insight into the benefits for patient risk stratification. In the Methylation Analysis to Locate Occult Cancer (MATLOC) study a negative predictive value of 90% was obtained, which represents a significant improvement over standard of care. This was confirmed in the Detection of Cancer Using Methylated Events in Negative Tissue (DOCUMENT) study (88% negative predictive value), which was designed to validate the performance in an independent cohort. The epigenetic assay, in combination with other known risk factors, may help reduce unnecessary repeat prostate biopsies and identify men at highest risk of harboring occult high-grade prostate cancer.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticBiopsyEarly Detection of CancerHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsValidation Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID28066067
PMCPMC5216473
OpenAlexW2578386265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.