Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28065711›Full record

ArticleHormones and behavior2017

A comparison of the effects of male pheromone priming and optogenetic inhibition of accessory olfactory bulb forebrain inputs on the sexual behavior of estrous female mice.

Elizabeth A McCarthy, Tenzin Kunkhyen, Wayne J Korzan, Ajay Naik, Arman Maqsudlu, James A Cherry, Michael J Baum

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hormones and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth A McCarthyDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Tenzin KunkhyenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Wayne J KorzanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Ajay NaikDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Arman MaqsudluDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
James A CherryDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Michael J BaumDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Boston University · US

Funding

Olfactory Circuits for Reproduction and RewardR01DC008962 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CHERRY, JAMES A. · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that repeated testing with a stimulus male is required for ovariectomized, hormone-primed female mice to become sexually receptive (show maximal lordosis quotients; LQs) and that drug-induced, epigenetic enhancement of estradiol receptor function accelerated the improvement in LQs otherwise shown by estrous females with repeated testing. We asked whether pre-exposure to male pheromones ('pheromone priming') would also accelerate the improvement in LQs with repeated tests and whether optogenetic inhibition of accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) projection neurons could inhibit lordosis in sexually experienced estrous female mice. In Experiment 1, repeated priming with soiled male bedding failed to accelerate the progressive improvement in LQs shown by estrous female mice across 5 tests, although the duration of each lordosis response and females' investigation of male body parts during the first test was augmented by such priming. In Experiment 2, acute optogenetic inhibition of AOB inputs to the forebrain during freely moving behavioral tests significantly reduced LQs, suggesting that continued AOB signaling to the forebrain during mating is required for maximal lordotic responsiveness even in sexually experienced females. Our results also suggest that pheromonal stimulation, by itself, cannot substitute for the full complement of sensory stimulation received by estrous females from mounting males that normally leads to the progressive improvement in their LQs with repeated testing.

Indexed as

OptogeneticsPostureAnimalsEstrusFemaleMaleMiceNeural InhibitionOlfactory BulbPheromonesSexual Behavior, AnimalPheromonesLordosisOdor investigationOptogeneticsPheromoneSexual behavior

Identifiers

PMID28065711
PMCPMC5359026
OpenAlexW2570757615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.