Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28065665›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2017

Unbiased Identification of Blood-based Biomarkers for Pulmonary Tuberculosis by Modeling and Mining Molecular Interaction Networks.

Awanti Sambarey, Abhinandan Devaprasad, Abhilash Mohan, Asma Ahmed, Soumya Nayak, Soumya Swaminathan, George D'Souza, Anto Jesuraj, Chirag Dhar, Subash Babu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Monocyte-Amplified Transcriptional Signatures of Human Diseases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Awanti SambareyDepartment of Biochemistry, IISc, Bangalore 560012, India.
Abhinandan DevaprasadDepartment of Biochemistry, IISc, Bangalore 560012, India.
Abhilash MohanDepartment of Biochemistry, IISc, Bangalore 560012, India.
Asma AhmedCentre for Infectious Disease Research (CIDR), IISc, Bangalore 560012, India.
Soumya NayakCentre for Infectious Disease Research (CIDR), IISc, Bangalore 560012, India.
Soumya SwaminathanNational Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Mayor Sathiyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai 600031, India.
George D'SouzaSt John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, 560034 Bangalore, India.
Anto JesurajSt John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, 560034 Bangalore, India.
Chirag DharSt John's Research Institute, St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences, 560034 Bangalore, India.
Subash BabuNIH-NIRT-ICER, Mayor Sathiyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai 600031, India.
Annapurna VyakarnamCentre for Infectious Disease Research (CIDR), IISc, Bangalore 560012, India; Department of Infectious Diseases, King's College London School of Medicine, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, UK.
Nagasuma ChandraDepartment of Biochemistry, IISc, Bangalore 560012, India. Electronic address: nchandra@biochem.iisc.ernet.in.
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · INSt. John's National Academy of Health Sciences · INKing's College London · GBNational Institute of Research in Tuberculosis · IN

Funding

India International Center for Excellence in ResearchZIAAI001065 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI NUTMAN, THOMAS · 2009 to 2025
$19.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is met with multiple challenges, calling for a shift of focus from pathogen-centric diagnostics towards identification of host-based multi-marker signatures. Transcriptomics offer a list of differentially expressed genes, but cannot by itself identify the most influential contributors to the disease phenotype. Here, we describe a computational pipeline that adopts an unbiased approach to identify a biomarker signature. Data from RNA sequencing from whole blood samples of TB patients were integrated with a curated genome-wide molecular interaction network, from which we obtain a comprehensive perspective of variations that occur in the host due to TB. We then implement a sensitive network mining method to shortlist gene candidates that are most central to the disease alterations. We then apply a series of filters that include applicability to multiple publicly available datasets as well as additional validation on independent patient samples, and identify a signature comprising 10 genes - FCGR1A, HK3, RAB13, RBBP8, IFI44L, TIMM10, BCL6, SMARCD3, CYP4F3 and SLPI, that can discriminate between TB and healthy controls as well as distinguish TB from latent tuberculosis and HIV in most cases. The signature has the potential to serve as a diagnostic marker of TB.

Indexed as

BiomarkersComputational BiologyData MiningModels, BiologicalMycobacterium tuberculosisAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesCluster AnalysisCoinfectionFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHIV InfectionsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansBiomarkersBiomarkersComputational medicineDiagnosticsNetwork biologyTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID28065665
PMCPMC5233809
OpenAlexW2561418870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.