Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28065599›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2017

Homology Requirements and Competition between Gene Conversion and Break-Induced Replication during Double-Strand Break Repair.

Anuja Mehta, Annette Beach, James E Haber

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanisms That Govern Recombinase Fidelity Control During Eukaryotic Homologous Recombination.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mutations and structural variants arising during double-strand break repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Mechanisms and genomic implications of break-induced replication.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anuja MehtaDepartment of Biology and Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454, USA.
Annette BeachDepartment of Biology and Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454, USA.
James E HaberDepartment of Biology and Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454, USA. Electronic address: haber@brandeis.edu.
Brandeis University · US

Funding

Recombination Mechanisms in Yeast Cell DifferentiationR37GM020056 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 2007 to 2016
$5.5M
Analysis of Break-Induced ReplicationR01GM076020 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 2006 to 2017
$3.4M
RECOMBINATION MECHANISMS IN YEAST CELL DIFFERENTIATIONR01GM020056 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 1985 to 2006
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM020056NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076020NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM020056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating-type switching is initiated by a double-strand break (DSB) at MATa, leaving one cut end perfectly homologous to the HMLα donor, while the second end must be processed to remove a non-homologous tail before completing repair by gene conversion (GC). When homology at the matched end is ≤150 bp, efficient repair depends on the recombination enhancer, which tethers HMLα near the DSB. Thus, homology shorter than an apparent minimum efficient processing segment can be rescued by tethering the donor near the break. When homology at the second end is ≤150 bp, second-end capture becomes inefficient and repair shifts from GC to break-induced replication (BIR). But when pol32 or pif1 mutants block BIR, GC increases 3-fold, indicating that the steps blocked by these mutations are reversible. With short second-end homology, absence of the RecQ helicase Sgs1 promotes gene conversion, whereas deletion of the FANCM-related Mph1 helicase promotes BIR.

Indexed as

DNA RepairDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA, FungalDNA ReplicationGene ConversionHomologous RecombinationRecQ HelicasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA, FungalMPH1 protein, S cerevisiaeRecQ HelicasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSGS1 protein, S cerevisiaebudding yeasthomologous recombinationhomology searchMph1(FANCM)Pif1Pol32recombination enhancerSgs1(BLM)strand invasion

Identifiers

PMID28065599
PMCPMC5291802
OpenAlexW2570439282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.