Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28065592›Full record

ArticleToxicology2017

Comparison of fluorescence-based methods to determine nanoparticle uptake by phagocytes and non-phagocytic cells in vitro.

Meindl Claudia, Öhlinger Kristin, Ober Jennifer, Roblegg Eva, Fröhlich Eleonore

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Size-Dependent Immunomodulatory Effects of FeMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meindl ClaudiaCenter for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstr. 24, 8010 Graz, Austria. Electronic address: Claudia.meindl@klinikum-graz.at.
Öhlinger KristinCenter for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstr. 24, 8010 Graz, Austria. Electronic address: kristin.oehlinger@medunigraz.at.
Ober JenniferCenter for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstr. 24, 8010 Graz, Austria. Electronic address: Jennifer.ober@medunigraz.at.
Roblegg EvaInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Karl-Franzens-University of Graz, Humboldtstr, 46, 8010 Graz, Austria. Electronic address: eva.roblegg@uni-graz.at.
Fröhlich EleonoreCenter for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstr. 24, 8010 Graz, Austria. Electronic address: eleonore.froehlich@medunigraz.at.
Medical University of Graz · ATUniversity of Graz · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 22576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At many portals of entry the relative uptake by phagocytes and non-phagocytic cells has a prominent effect on availability and biological action of nanoparticles (NPs). Cellular uptake can be determined for fluorescence-labeled NPs. The present study compares three methods (plate reader, flow cytometry and image analysis) in order to investigate the influence of particle size and functionalization and medium content on cellular uptake of fluorescence-labeled polystyrene particles and to study the respective method́s suitability for uptake studies. For comparison between the techniques, ratios of macrophage to alveolar epithelial cell uptakes were used. Presence of serum protein in the exposure solution decreased uptake of carboxyl-functionalized and non-functionalized particles; there was no clear effect for the amine-functionalized particles. The 200nm non- or carboxyl-functionalized NPs were taken up preferentially by phagocytes while for amine-functionalized particles preference was lowest. The presence of the serum slightly increased the preference for these particles. In conclusion, due to the possibility of calibration, plate reader measurements might present a better option than the other techniques to (semi)quantify differences between phagocytes and non-phagocytic cells for particles with different fluorescence. In order to obtain unbiased data the fluorescent labeling has to fulfill certain requirements.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesA549 CellsAnimalsCell LineCell SurvivalCoculture TechniquesEndocytosisEpithelial CellsFlow CytometryFluorescenceFluorescent DyesMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalParticle SizePhagocytesPolystyrenesFluorescent DyesPolystyrenesCellular uptakeExposure conditionsInhalation exposureNanoparticlesPhagocytes

Identifiers

PMID28065592
PMCPMC5410379
OpenAlexW2569250053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.