Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28065198›Full record

ArticleVisual neuroscience2017

Random spatial patterning of cone bipolar cell mosaics in the mouse retina.

Patrick W Keeley, Jason J Kim, Sammy C S Lee, Silke Haverkamp, Benjamin E Reese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A complete spatial map of mouse retinal ganglion cells reveals density and gene expression specializations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Contraction of axonal and dendritic fields inFrontiers in neuroanatomy · 2022
    Article
  4. Interrelationships between Cellular Density, Mosaic Patterning, and Dendritic Coverage of VGluT3 Amacrine Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrick W KeeleyNeuroscience Research Institute,University of California,Santa Barbara,CA 93106-5060.
Jason J KimNeuroscience Research Institute,University of California,Santa Barbara,CA 93106-5060.
Sammy C S LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology and Save Sight Institute,University of Sydney,Sydney,NSW 2000,Australia.
Silke HaverkampInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Anatomy,Goethe-University,Frankfurt am Main 60590,Germany.
Benjamin E ReeseNeuroscience Research Institute,University of California,Santa Barbara,CA 93106-5060.

Funding

Development of Retinal Bipolar CellsR01EY019968 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI REESE, BENJAMIN E · 2010 to 2023
$4.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal bipolar cells spread their dendritic arbors to tile the retinal surface, extending them to the tips of the dendritic fields of their homotypic neighbors, minimizing dendritic overlap. Such uniform nonredundant dendritic coverage of these populations would suggest a degree of spatial order in the properties of their somal distributions, yet few studies have examined the patterning in retinal bipolar cell mosaics. The present study examined the organization of two types of cone bipolar cells in the mouse retina, the Type 2 cells and the Type 4 cells, and compared their spatial statistical properties with those of the horizontal cells and the cholinergic amacrine cells, as well as to random simulations of cells matched in density and constrained by soma size. The Delauney tessellation of each field was computed, from which nearest neighbor distances and Voronoi domain areas were extracted, permitting a calculation of their respective regularity indexes (RIs). The spatial autocorrelation of the field was also computed, from which the effective radius and packing factor (PF) were determined. Both cone bipolar cell types were found to be less regular and less efficiently packed than either the horizontal cells or cholinergic amacrine cells. Furthermore, while the latter two cell types had RIs and PFs in excess of those for their matched random simulations, the two types of cone bipolar cells had spatial statistical properties comparable to random distributions. An analysis of single labeled cone bipolar cells revealed dendritic arbors frequently skewed to one side of the soma, as would be expected from a randomly distributed population of cells with dendrites that tile. Taken together, these results suggest that, unlike the horizontal cells or cholinergic amacrine cells which minimize proximity to one another, cone bipolar cell types are constrained only by their physical size.

Indexed as

Amacrine CellsAnimalsCell CountDendritesMiceMice, Inbred AMice, Inbred C57BLRetinaRetinal Bipolar CellsRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Horizontal CellsDendritic coverageEffective radiusExclusion zoneNearest neighborPacking factorRegularity indexVoronoi domain

Identifiers

PMID28065198
PMCPMC5624321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.