Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28064439›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2017

Eugenol specialty chemical production in transgenic poplar (Populus tremula × P. alba) field trials.

Da Lu, Xianghe Yuan, Sung-Jin Kim, Joaquim V Marques, P Pawan Chakravarthy, Syed G A Moinuddin, Randi Luchterhand, Barri Herman, Laurence B Davin, Norman G Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Towards a sustainable bio-based economy: Redirecting primary metabolism to new products with plant synthetic biology.Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Da LuInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Xianghe YuanInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Sung-Jin KimInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Joaquim V MarquesInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
P Pawan ChakravarthyInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Syed G A MoinuddinInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Randi LuchterhandPuyallup Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Puyallup, WA, USA.
Barri HermanInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Laurence B DavinInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Norman G LewisInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A foundational study assessed effects of biochemical pathway introduction into poplar to produce eugenol, chavicol, p-anol, isoeugenol and their sequestered storage products, from potentially available substrates, coniferyl and p-coumaryl alcohols. At the onset, it was unknown whether significant carbon flux to monolignols vs. other phenylpropanoid (acetate) pathway metabolites would be kinetically favoured. Various transgenic poplar lines generated eugenol and chavicol glucosides in ca. 0.45% (~0.35 and ~0.1%, respectively) of dry weight foliage tissue in field trials, as well as their corresponding aglycones in trace amounts. There were only traces of any of these metabolites in branch tissues, even after ~4-year field trials. Levels of bioproduct accumulation in foliage plateaued, even at the lowest introduced gene expression levels, suggesting limited monolignol substrate availability. Nevertheless, this level still allows foliage collection for platform chemical production, with the remaining (stem) biomass available for wood, pulp/paper and bioenergy product purposes. Several transformed lines displayed unexpected precocious flowering after 4-year field trial growth. This necessitated terminating (felling) these particular plants, as USDA APHIS prohibits the possibility of their interacting (cross-pollination, etc.) with wild-type (native plant) lines. In future, additional biotechnological approaches can be employed (e.g. gene editing) to produce sterile plant lines, to avoid such complications. While increased gene expression did not increase target bioproduct accumulation, the exciting possibility now exists of significantly increasing their amounts (e.g. 10- to 40-fold plus) in foliage and stems via systematic deployment of numerous 'omics', systems biology, synthetic biology and metabolic flux modelling approaches.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyEugenolGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlants, Genetically ModifiedPopulusEugenolEugenolhybrid poplarphenylpropanoid metabolismphytochemical factories

Identifiers

PMID28064439
PMCPMC5506655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.