Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28064355›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2017

Population pharmacokinetic models of lamotrigine in different age groups of Chinese children with epilepsy.

Zhong-Bin Zhang, Shuang-Min Ji, Ying Han, Li-Li Zang, Ying-Hui Wang, Wei Lu, Li Wang, Ye Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How to Handle Delayed or Missed Doses: A Population Pharmacokinetic Perspective.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhong-Bin ZhangDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, No.1 Xi'an Men Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Shuang-Min JiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, No.38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ying HanDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, No.1 Xi'an Men Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Li-Li ZangDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, No.1 Xi'an Men Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Ying-Hui WangDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, No.1 Xi'an Men Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Wei LuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, No.38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Li WangDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, No.1 Xi'an Men Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Ye WuDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, No.1 Xi'an Men Street, West District, Beijing, 100034, China. dryewu@263.net.
Peking University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aims to establish population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models of lamotrigine (LTG) in different age groups of epileptic children by nonlinear mixed effect modelling(NONMEM), and provide essential tools and theoretical basis for individualised optimal drug dose.

methodsCases of 473 epileptic children were divided into infant, toddler and preschool age (≤6 years) (n = 211), school age (6-12 years) (n = 171) and adolescence age (>12 years) (n = 81). A total of 625 steady-state serum trough concentration samples were extracted. The clinical information included demography, medication, serum concentration data and blood biochemical parameters. PPK models of LTG were established by NONMEM program, using first-order absorption and elimination. Demography and drug combination was investigated for influence on apparent clearance (CL) and apparent volume of distribution (Vd). To assess the accuracy and precision of the different ages and whole-age model, the mean prediction error (MPE), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) were compared.

resultsThe final model of LTG in different ages stage and whole age was as follows: (1) infant, toddler and preschool age CL = 0.715 × [(WEIG/16.25)

conclusionPPK models of LTG in different age groups of epileptic children were successfully established. Weight and combination therapy were identified as significant covariates on LTG clearance. Compared with the whole-age model, the age-specific models are more reliable.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsChildChild, PreschoolChinaHumansInfantLamotrigineTriazinesAnticonvulsantsLamotrigineTriazinesChinese childrenEpilepsyLamotriginePopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID28064355
OpenAlexW2569881252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.