Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28064004›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurobiology2017

Wiring visual systems: common and divergent mechanisms and principles.

Alex L Kolodkin, P Robin Hiesinger

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex L KolodkinThe Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Electronic address: kolodkin@jhmi.edu.
P Robin HiesingerDivision of Neurobiology of the Institute for Biology, Free University Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: robin.hiesinger@fu-berlin.de.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Regulation of Synaptic Specificity in the Visual System by Intracellular TraffickR01EY018884 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HIESINGER, PETER ROBIN · 2008 to 2018
$3.6M
A Drosophila Model for Charcot-Marie-Tooth 2B DiseaseR01EY023333 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HIESINGER, PETER ROBIN · 2013 to 2017
$1.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS R01 EY018884NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of visual systems has a rich history, leading to the discovery and understanding of basic principles underlying the elaboration of neuronal connectivity. Recent work in model organisms such as fly, fish and mouse has yielded a wealth of new insights into visual system wiring. Here, we consider how axonal and dendritic patterning in columns and laminae influence synaptic partner selection in these model organisms. We highlight similarities and differences among disparate visual systems with the goal of identifying common and divergent principles for visual system wiring.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsBody PatterningDendritesModels, AnimalNeuronsVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID28064004
PMCPMC5316370
OpenAlexW2569610364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.