ArticleThe journal of pain2017
Initial Development and Validation of a Patient-Reported Symptom Survey for Small-Fiber Polyneuropathy.
Article in The journal of pain, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Assessing Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Polyneuropathies, Focusing on Guillain-Barré Syndrome and Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025Pooled it
- Epidermal Neurite Density in Skin Biopsies From Patients With Juvenile Fibromyalgia.The Journal of rheumatology · 2021Pooled it
- Uncovering Hidden Profiles: From Pain-Centric to Multi-Symptom Small Fiber Neuropathy.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Relapsing-Remitting Immunotherapy Responsive Small-Fiber Neuropathy: Longitudinal Tracking Through 10 Years Including Pregnancies.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2024Article
- Initial validation of the Mass. General Neuropathy Exam Tool (MAGNET) for evaluation of distal small-fiber neuropathy.Muscle & nerve · 2024Article
- Peripheral Neuropathy Evaluations of Patients With Prolonged Long COVID.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2022Article
- Article
- Neuropathic Itch: Routes to Clinical Diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Association of small-fiber polyneuropathy with three previously unassociated rare missense SCN9A variants.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2020Article
- Scientific Advances in and Clinical Approaches to Small-Fiber Polyneuropathy: A Review.JAMA neurology · 2019Article
- IVIg for apparently autoimmune small-fiber polyneuropathy: first analysis of efficacy and safety.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2018Article
- Specific symptoms may discriminate between fibromyalgia patients with vs without objective test evidence of small-fiber polyneuropathy.Pain reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Small-fiber polyneuropathy (SFPN) affects unmyelinated and thinly myelinated peripheral axons. Several questionnaires have been developed to assess polyneuropathy from diabetes or chemotherapy, but none for SFPN from other or unknown causes. A comprehensive survey could help clinicians diagnose and assess treatment responses, define prevalence natural history and cures, and identify research subjects. Thus, we developed the 1-page Small-Fiber Symptom Survey, using input from patients and 21 medical/scientific experts. Participants comprised consenting consecutive patients evaluated for SFPN at the Massachusetts General Hospital plus normal control subjects. Participants SFPN status was stratified on the basis of the results of their objective diagnostic tests (distal leg skin biopsy and autonomic function testing). We measured internal consistency, test retest reliability, convergent validity, and performed a receiver operating curve analysis. The 179 participants averaged 46.6 ± 15.6 years old; they were 73.2% female and 92.2% Caucasian. Eighty-five had confirmed SFPN, mostly idiopathic. Principal component analysis revealed 5 symptom clusters. The questionnaire had good internal consistency (Cronbach α = .893), excellent test retest reliability (r = .927, P < .001) and good to fair convergent validity. Participants with confirmed SFPN had more severe symptoms than others (P = .009). The Small-Fiber Symptom Survey has satisfactory psychometric properties, indicating potential future utility for surveying patient-reported symptoms of SFPN regardless of its cause. PERSPECTIVE: This article reports the initial development and early psychometric validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure intended to capture the wide range of multisystem symptoms of SFPN. When further developed, it could potentially help clinicians diagnose and monitor patients, and help advance research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.