Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28063922›Full record

SynthesisBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]

Efficacy and safety of a four-drug fixed-dose combination regimen versus separate drugs for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Glaura C Lima, Emilia V Silva, Pérola de O Magalhães, Janeth S Naves

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Glaura C LimaLaboratório Central de Saúde Pública (LACEN) - Brasília, Departamento de Biologia Médica, Seção Micobaterial, Brasília, DF, Brazil. Electronic address: glauracaldo@gmail.com.
Emilia V SilvaUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Ceilândia, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Pérola de O MagalhãesUniversidade de Brasília, Departamento de Farmácia, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Janeth S NavesUniversidade de Brasília, Departamento de Farmácia, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Universidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTuberculosis, particularly multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. To the best of our knowledge, however, no study to date has assessed the combined use of the four available drugs for tuberculosis treatment, which is an issue of great clinical relevance.

objectiveTo determine whether the four-drug fixed-dose combination is safer or more effective than separate drugs for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

resultsIn pooled results from five randomized controlled trials with 3502 patients across Africa, Asia, and Latin America, four-drug fixed-dose combination therapy was no better than separate drugs therapy in terms of culture conversion after 2 and 6 months of treatment. There were no significant differences between the groups in overall incidence of adverse effects. However, the meta-analytic measure (log odds ratio) revealed that separate drugs treatment had a 1.65 [exp (0.5)=1.65] increased chance of gastrointestinal adverse effects compared to four-drug fixed-dose combination treatment.

conclusionsThe reviewed studies showed that four-drug fixed-dose combination therapy provides greater patient comfort by reducing the number of pills and the incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects, as well as simplifying pharmaceutical management at all levels.

Indexed as

AfricaAmericasAntitubercular AgentsDrug CombinationsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansLatin AmericaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeTuberculosis, PulmonaryAntitubercular AgentsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID28063922
PMCPMC5470440
OpenAlexW2563811107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.