Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28063849›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Recruitment, Promotion, and Retention of Women in Academic Medicine: How Institutions Are Addressing Gender Disparities.

Phyllis L Carr, Christine Gunn, Anita Raj, Samantha Kaplan, Karen M Freund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
32.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gender dynamics in Animal Science: progress, pitfalls, and pathways forward.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2025
    Article
  11. Gender Equity Education in Oncology: A Survey Study of Hematology-Oncology Fellowship Program Directors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Perspectives and needs of neonatology division directors regarding gender equity.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Phyllis L CarrMassachusetts General Hospital, Women's Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: pcarr1@partners.org.
Christine GunnBoston University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Women's Health Unit, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anita RajUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Samantha KaplanBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Karen M FreundTufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Boston University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USTufts Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Longitudinal Follow-up to the National Faculty SurveyR01GM088470 · NIGMS · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CARR, PHYLLIS, FREUND, KAREN · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGreater numbers of women in medicine have not resulted in more women achieving senior positions. Programs supporting the recruitment, promotion, and retention of women in academic medicine could help to achieve greater advancement of more women to leadership positions. Qualitative research was conducted to understand such programs at 23 institutions and, using the social ecological model, examine how they operate at the individual, interpersonal, institutional, academic community, and policy levels.

methodsTelephone interviews were conducted with faculty representatives (n = 44) of the Group on Women in Medicine and Science, Diversity and Inclusion, or senior leaders with knowledge on gender climate in 24 medical schools. Four trained interviewers conducted semistructured interviews that addressed faculty perceptions of gender equity and advancement, which were audiotaped and transcribed. The data were categorized into three content areas-recruitment, promotion, and retention-and coded a priori for each area based on their social ecological level of operation.

findingsParticipants from nearly 40% of the institutions reported no special programs for recruiting, promoting, or retaining women, largely describing such programming as unnecessary. Existing programs primarily targeted the individual and interpersonal levels simultaneously, via training, mentoring, and networking, or the institutional level, via search committee trainings, child and elder care, and spousal hiring programs. Lesser effort at the academic community and policy levels were described.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that many U.S. medical schools have no programs supporting gender equity among medical faculty. Existing programs primarily target the individual or interpersonal level of the social ecological interaction. The academic community and broader policy environment require greater focus as levels with little attention to advancing women's careers. Universal multilevel efforts are needed to more effectively advance the careers of medical women faculty and support gender equity.

Indexed as

Career MobilityFaculty, MedicalLeadershipPhysicians, WomenSchools, MedicalAcademic Medical CentersAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial EnvironmentSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID28063849
PMCPMC5435548
OpenAlexW2569731256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.