Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28063823›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2017

But is helping you worth the risk? Defining Prosocial Risk Taking in adolescence.

Kathy T Do, João F Guassi Moreira, Eva H Telzer

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Opposing Roles of Testosterone and Cortisol in Prosocial Risk-Taking.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Beyond risk reduction: Exploring the relation of cognitive control with adolescent positive and negative risk-taking.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Positive risk taking across the world.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathy T DoDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States. Electronic address: kathydo@unc.edu.
João F Guassi MoreiraDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, United States. Electronic address: jguassimoreira@ucla.edu.
Eva H TelzerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States. Electronic address: ehtelzer@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Incorporating the Social Context into Neurocognitive Models of Adolescent Risk TakingR01DA039923 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TELZER, EVA HAIMO · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work has shown that the same neural circuitry that typically underlies risky behaviors also contributes to prosocial behaviors. Despite the striking overlap between two seemingly distinct behavioral patterns, little is known about how risk taking and prosociality interact and inform adolescent decision making. We review literature on adolescent brain development as it pertains to risk taking and prosociality and propose a new area of study, Prosocial Risk Taking, which suggests that adolescents can make risky decisions with the intention of helping other individuals. Given key socialization processes and ongoing neurodevelopmental changes during this time, adolescence may represent a sensitive period for the emergence of Prosocial Risk Taking, especially within a wide variety of social contexts when youth's increased sensitivity to social evaluation and belonging impacts their behaviors. Prosocial Risk Taking in adolescence is an area of study that has been overlooked in the literature, but could help explain how ontogenetic changes in the adolescent brain may create not only vulnerabilities, but also opportunities for healthy prosocial development.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingSocial BehaviorAdolescentAdolescent DevelopmentBrainDecision MakingFemaleHumansAdolescenceProsocialProsocial risk takingRisk takingSocial brainSocial sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID28063823
PMCPMC5461219
OpenAlexW2559847642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.