Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28063255›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Targeting of the Fun30 nucleosome remodeller by the Dpb11 scaffold facilitates cell cycle-regulated DNA end resection.

Susanne Cs Bantele, Pedro Ferreira, Dalia Gritenaite, Dominik Boos, Boris Pfander

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. γH2A/γH2AX Mediates DNA Damage-Specific Control of Checkpoint Signaling inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. DNA end resection during homologous recombination.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne Cs BanteleDNA Replication and Genome Integrity, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Pedro FerreiraCentre for Medical Biotechnology, Molecular Genetics II, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Dalia GritenaiteDNA Replication and Genome Integrity, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.
Dominik BoosCentre for Medical Biotechnology, Molecular Genetics II, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Boris PfanderDNA Replication and Genome Integrity, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2180-5054
Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by either recombination-based or direct ligation-based mechanisms. Pathway choice is made at the level of DNA end resection, a nucleolytic processing step, which primes DSBs for repair by recombination. Resection is thus under cell cycle control, but additionally regulated by chromatin and nucleosome remodellers. Here, we show that both layers of control converge in the regulation of resection by the evolutionarily conserved Fun30/SMARCAD1 remodeller. Budding yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 are cell cycle-regulated by interaction with the DSB-localized scaffold protein Dpb11/TOPBP1, respectively. In yeast, this protein assembly additionally comprises the 9-1-1 damage sensor, is involved in localizing Fun30 to damaged chromatin, and thus is required for efficient long-range resection of DSBs. Notably, artificial targeting of Fun30 to DSBs is sufficient to bypass the cell cycle regulation of long-range resection, indicating that chromatin remodelling during resection is underlying DSB repair pathway choice.

Indexed as

Cell CycleDNA ReplicationCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalDNA HelicasesDNA RepairHumansNuclear ProteinsRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalDNA HelicasesDPB11 protein, S cerevisiaeFUN30 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSMARCAD1 protein, humanTOPBP1 protein, humanTranscription Factorsbiochemistrycell biologycell cyclechromatinDNA recombinationdouble strand breakshumanphosphorylationS. cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID28063255
PMCPMC5300703
OpenAlexW2568621309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.