Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28063102›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2017

Quantitative analyses of the bacterial microbiota of rearing environment, tilapia and common carp cultured in earthen ponds and inhibitory activity of its lactic acid bacteria on fish spoilage and pathogenic bacteria.

Pierre Marie Kaktcham, Jules-Bocamdé Temgoua, François Ngoufack Zambou, Gloria Diaz-Ruiz, Carmen Wacher, María de Lourdes Pérez-Chabela

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Feasibility of Rainbow Trout (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Fermentation of Plant-Based Feeds withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. FermentedFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierre Marie KaktchamLaboratory of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition (LABPMAN), Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, Cameroon, P.O Box 67, Dschang, Cameroon. kapima79@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0213-8858
Jules-Bocamdé TemgouaLaboratory of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition (LABPMAN), Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, Cameroon, P.O Box 67, Dschang, Cameroon.
François Ngoufack ZambouLaboratory of Biochemistry, Food Science and Nutrition (LABPMAN), Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang, Cameroon, P.O Box 67, Dschang, Cameroon.
Gloria Diaz-RuizDepartamento de Alimentos y Biotecnología, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad Universitaria Coyoacán, 04510, Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Carmen WacherDepartamento de Alimentos y Biotecnología, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad Universitaria Coyoacán, 04510, Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
María de Lourdes Pérez-ChabelaDepartamento de Biotecnología, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa (UAM-I), Av. San Rafael Atlixco 186, 09340, Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico.
Université de Dschang · CMUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversidad Autónoma Metropolitana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the bacterial load of water, Nile Tilapia and common Carp intestines from earthen ponds, isolate lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and assess their antimicrobial activity against fish spoilage and pathogenic bacteria. Following enumeration and isolation of microorganisms the antimicrobial activity of the LAB isolates was evaluated. Taxonomic identification of selected antagonistic LAB strains was assessed, followed by partial characterisation of their antimicrobial metabolites. Results showed that high counts (>4 log c.f.u ml

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriaBacteria, AerobicBacterial LoadBacteriocinsCarpsEcologyFatty AcidsFish DiseasesFood MicrobiologyIntestinesLactic AcidLactococcus lactisPhylogenyAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriocinsFatty AcidsLactic AcidBacterial loadBacteriocinsFish intestineLAB’s antimicrobial activityPond waterShort chain fatty acids

Identifiers

PMID28063102
OpenAlexW2568507945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.