Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2018
Comparative study of 25- versus 20-gauge pars plana capsulotomy and vitrectomy in pediatric cataract surgery.
Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision and efficacy in congenital cataract surgery: a retrospective study of the 27-gauge vitrectomy system.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Commentary review: challenges of intraocular lens implantation for congenital cataract infants.International journal of ophthalmology · 2021Review
- Cataract management in children: a review of the literature and current practice across five large UK centres.Eye (London, England) · 2020Review
- Surgical outcomes of primary intraocular lens implantation for the treatment of aphakia in pediatric cataracts in the Brazilian public health system.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare 25- and 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for the management of pediatric cataract.
methods20 eyes of 15 patients were randomly divided into two groups to undergo pars plana capsulotomy and vitrectomy by either 25-gauge (group A) or 20-gauge (group B) PPV after lens aspiration and IOL implantation. The two groups were compared for total surgical time, time taken in doing pars plana capsulotomy and vitrectomy, and the size of posterior capsulotomy. Post-operative astigmatism was compared at 3 months.
resultsThe mean total surgical time in group A was 49.2 ± 6.7 min, while mean total surgical time in group B was 62.5 + 5.48 min (p = 0.001). The mean time taken for pars plana capsulotomy and vitrectomy was 4.1 ± 1.19 min in group A and 5.0 ± 0.73 min (p = 0.03) in group B. The mean size of the PCCC in group A was 3.3 ± 0.34 mm, while in group B it was 4.0 ± 0.33 mm (p = 0.001). The mean astigmatism at 3 months in group A was 0.65 ± 0.31 diopters, while in group B it was 1.45 ± 0.92 diopters (p = 0.019).
conclusions25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless PPV can be an attractive alternative to 20-gauge system in the management of pediatric cataracts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28063099What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.