Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28063078›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2017

Analysis of acetabular orientation and femoral anteversion using images of three-dimensional reconstructed bone models.

Jaeyeong Park, Jun-Young Kim, Hyun Deok Kim, Young Cheol Kim, Anna Seo, Minkyu Je, Jong Uk Mun, Bia Kim, Il Hyung Park, Shin-Yoon Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jaeyeong ParkDivision of Biomedical Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jun-Young KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea. dr.junyoung@gmail.com.
Hyun Deok KimInstitute of Advanced Convergence Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Young Cheol KimInstitute of Advanced Convergence Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Anna SeoInstitute of Advanced Convergence Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Minkyu JeSchool of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jong Uk MunDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Changwon Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea.
Bia KimDepartment of Psychology, Pusan National University, Pusan, Republic of Korea.
Il Hyung ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.
Shin-Yoon KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130 Dongeok-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu, 41944, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadiographic measurements using two-dimensional (2D) plain radiographs or planes from computed tomography (CT) scans have several drawbacks, while measurements using images of three-dimensional (3D) reconstructed bone models can provide more consistent anthropometric information. We compared the consistency of results using measurements based on images of 3D reconstructed bone models (3D measurements) with those using planes from CT scans (measurements using 2D slice images).

methodsNinety-six of 561 patients who had undergone deep vein thrombosis-CT between January 2013 and November 2014 were randomly selected. We evaluated measurements using 2D slice images and 3D measurements. The images used for 3D reconstruction of bone models were obtained and measured using [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] (Materialize, Leuven, Belgium).

resultsThe mean acetabular inclination, acetabular anteversion and femoral anteversion values on 2D slice images were 42.01[Formula: see text], 18.64[Formula: see text] and 14.44[Formula: see text], respectively, while those using images of 3D reconstructed bone models were 52.80[Formula: see text], 14.98[Formula: see text] and 17.26[Formula: see text]. Intra-rater reliabilities for acetabular inclination, acetabular anteversion, and femoral anteversion on 2D slice images were 0.55, 0.81, and 0.85, respectively, while those for 3D measurements were 0.98, 0.99, and 0.98. Inter-rater reliabilities for acetabular inclination, acetabular anteversion and femoral anteversion on 2D slice images were 0.48, 0.86, and 0.84, respectively, while those for 3D measurements were 0.97, 0.99, and 0.97.

conclusionThe differences between the two measurements are explained by the use of different tools. However, more consistent measurements were possible using the images of 3D reconstructed bone models. Therefore, 3D measurement can be a good alternative to measurement using 2D slice images.

Indexed as

AcetabulumAgedFemaleFemurHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedOrientation, SpatialPlastic Surgery ProceduresRadiographyReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedVenous Thrombosis3D measurementsAcetabular orientationFemoral anteversionImages of 3D reconstructed bone modelsMeasurements using 2D slice images

Identifiers

PMID28063078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.