Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28062755›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016

Evolutionary Conservation and Divergence of Gene Coexpression Networks in Gossypium (Cotton) Seeds.

Guanjing Hu, Ran Hovav, Corrinne E Grover, Adi Faigenboim-Doron, Noa Kadmon, Justin T Page, Joshua A Udall, Jonathan F Wendel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Distinct evolutionary trajectories of gene duplication modes in 40 diploid cotton genomes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Harnessing polyploidy for climate-resilient crops: Lessons from the evolutionary model, allotetraploid cotton.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Guanjing HuDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, USA.
Ran HovavAgricultural Research Organization (Volcani Center), Bet Dagan, Israel.
Corrinne E GroverDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, USA.
Adi Faigenboim-DoronAgricultural Research Organization (Volcani Center), Bet Dagan, Israel.
Noa KadmonAgricultural Research Organization (Volcani Center), Bet Dagan, Israel.
Justin T PageBiology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA.
Joshua A UdallBiology Department, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA.
Jonathan F WendelDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, USA.
Agricultural Research Organization · ILIowa State University · USBrigham Young University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cotton genus (Gossypium) provides a superior system for the study of diversification, genome evolution, polyploidization, and human-mediated selection. To gain insight into phenotypic diversification in cotton seeds, we conducted coexpression network analysis of developing seeds from diploid and allopolyploid cotton species and explored network properties. Key network modules and functional associations were identified related to seed oil content and seed weight. We compared species-specific networks to reveal topological changes, including rewired edges and differentially coexpressed genes, associated with speciation, polyploidy, and cotton domestication. Network comparisons among species indicate that topologies are altered in addition to gene expression profiles, indicating that changes in transcriptomic coexpression relationships play a role in the developmental architecture of cotton seed development. The global network topology of allopolyploids, especially for domesticated G. hirsutum, resembles the network of the A-genome diploid more than that of the D-genome parent, despite its D-like phenotype in oil content. Expression modifications associated with allopolyploidy include coexpression level dominance and transgressive expression, suggesting that the transcriptomic architecture in polyploids is to some extent a modular combination of that of its progenitor genomes. Among allopolyploids, intermodular relationships are more preserved between two different wild allopolyploid species than they are between wild and domesticated forms of a cultivated cotton, and regulatory connections of oil synthesis-related pathways are denser and more closely clustered in domesticated vs. wild G. hirsutum. These results demonstrate substantial modification of genic coexpression under domestication. Our work demonstrates how network inference informs our understanding of the transcriptomic architecture of phenotypic variation associated with temporal scales ranging from thousands (domestication) to millions (speciation) of years, and by polyploidy.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGossypiumHumansPolyploidySeedsSelection, Geneticdomesticationgene coexpression networkGossypiumoil seedpolyploid evolution

Identifiers

PMID28062755
PMCPMC5585989
OpenAlexW2568212138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.