Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28062685›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2017

Development and validation of the INCREMENT-ESBL predictive score for mortality in patients with bloodstream infections due to extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Zaira Raquel Palacios-Baena, Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Marina De Cueto, Pierluigi Viale, Mario Venditti, Alicia Hernández-Torres, Antonio Oliver, Luis Martínez-Martínez, Esther Calbo, Vicente Pintado and 27 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Carbapenem or new β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitors? An Italian survey supported by SITA, SIMIT and SIAARTI to identify the factors affecting empiric antimicrobial therapy choice in real-life clinical practice.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Zaira Raquel Palacios-BaenaUnidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla-IBiS, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen Macarena y Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Belén Gutiérrez-GutiérrezUnidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla-IBiS, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen Macarena y Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Marina De CuetoUnidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla-IBiS, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen Macarena y Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Pierluigi VialeTeaching Hospital Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
Mario VendittiPoliclinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
Alicia Hernández-TorresHospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Antonio OliverHospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Luis Martínez-MartínezHospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Departamento de Biología Molecular, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain.
Esther CalboHospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Vicente PintadoServicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Oriol GaschHospital Parc Taulí, Barcelona, Spain.
Benito AlmiranteServicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.
José Antonio LepeUnidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla-IBiS, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen Macarena y Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Johann PitoutUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Murat AkovaHacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Carmen Peña-MirallesHospital Universitari Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Mitchell J SchwaberTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, National Center for Infection Control, Israel Ministry of Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Mario TumbarelloCatholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Evelina TacconelliTübingen University Hospital and Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Tübingen, Germany.
Julia OrigüenUnidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Nuria PrimHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
German BouComplejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Helen GiamarellouHygeia General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Joaquín BermejoHospital Español, Rosario, Argentina.
Axel HamprechtInstitut für Mikrobiologie, Immunologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Federico PérezLouis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Manuel AlmelaHospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Warren LowmanWits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa.
Po-Ren HsuehNational Taiwan University Hospital, Taiwan.
Carolina Navarro-San FranciscoHospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Julián Torre-CisnerosMaimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba (IMIBIC), Unidades de Gestión Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Reina Sofia University Hospital and University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Yehuda CarmeliTel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, National Center for Infection Control, Israel Ministry of Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Robert A BonomoResearch Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Departments of Medicine, Pharmacology, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
David L PatersonUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, Brisbane, Australia.
Álvaro PascualUnidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla-IBiS, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen Macarena y Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
Jesús Rodríguez-BañoUnidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Microbiología y Medicina Preventiva, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla-IBiS, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen Macarena y Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
REIPI/ESGBIS/INCREMENT Group

Funding

Understanding B-Lactam Resistance in Acinetobacter baumanniiR01AI072219 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT A. BONOMO, Philip N. Rather · 2007 to 2026
$6.6M
Understanding ceftazidime resistance in SHV B-LactamasesR01AI063517 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BONOMO, ROBERT A. · 2005 to 2023
$4.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI063517NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) are frequent yet outcome prediction rules for clinical use have not been developed. The objective was to define and validate a predictive risk score for 30 day mortality. Methods: A multinational retrospective cohort study including consecutive episodes of BSI due to ESBL-E was performed; cases were randomly assigned to a derivation cohort (DC) or a validation cohort (VC). The main outcome variable was all-cause 30 day mortality. A predictive score was developed using logistic regression coefficients for the DC, then tested in the VC. Results: The DC and VC included 622 and 328 episodes, respectively. The final multivariate logistic regression model for mortality in the DC included age >50 years (OR = 2.63; 95% CI: 1.18-5.85; 3 points), infection due to Klebsiella spp. (OR = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.21-3.58; 2 points), source other than urinary tract (OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 2.02-6.44; 3 points), fatal underlying disease (OR = 3.91; 95% CI: 2.24-6.80; 4 points), Pitt score >3 (OR = 3.04; 95 CI: 1.69-5.47; 3 points), severe sepsis or septic shock at presentation (OR = 4.8; 95% CI: 2.72-8.46; 4 points) and inappropriate early targeted therapy (OR = 2.47; 95% CI: 1.58-4.63; 2 points). The score showed an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.85 in the DC and 0.82 in the VC. Mortality rates for patients with scores of < 11 and ≥11 were 5.6% and 45.9%, respectively, in the DC, and 5.4% and 34.8% in the VC. Conclusions: We developed and validated an easy-to-collect predictive scoring model for all-cause 30 day mortality useful for identifying patients at high and low risk of mortality.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiabeta-LactamasesEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsFemaleHumansKlebsiellaKlebsiella InfectionsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID28062685
PMCPMC5890678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.