Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28062448›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

ontologyX: a suite of R packages for working with ontological data.

Daniel Greene, Sylvia Richardson, Ernest Turro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proteomic profile data ofData in brief · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel GreeneMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
Sylvia RichardsonMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
Ernest TurroMRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_0801/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Summary: Ontologies are widely used constructs for encoding and analyzing biomedical data, but the absence of simple and consistent tools has made exploratory and systematic analysis of such data unnecessarily difficult. Here we present three packages which aim to simplify such procedures. The ontologyIndex package enables arbitrary ontologies to be read into R, supports representation of ontological objects by native R types, and provides a parsimonius set of performant functions for querying ontologies. ontologySimilarity and ontologyPlot extend ontologyIndex with functionality for straightforward visualization and semantic similarity calculations, including statistical routines. Availability and Implementation: ontologyIndex , ontologyPlot and ontologySimilarity are all available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network website under https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ . Contact: Daniel Greene dg333@cam.ac.uk. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Biological OntologiesSoftware

Identifiers

PMID28062448
PMCPMC5386138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.