Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28062445›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

Algorithm sensitivity analysis and parameter tuning for tissue image segmentation pipelines.

George Teodoro, Tahsin M Kurç, Luís F R Taveira, Alba C M A Melo, Yi Gao, Jun Kong, Joel H Saltz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. On the Analyses of Medical Images Using Traditional Machine Learning Techniques and Convolutional Neural Networks.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Parallel and Efficient Sensitivity Analysis of Microscopy Image Segmentation Workflows in Hybrid Systems.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

George TeodoroDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Tahsin M KurçBiomedical Informatics Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8322, USA.
Luís F R TaveiraDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Alba C M A MeloDepartment of Computer Science, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.
Yi GaoBiomedical Informatics Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8322, USA.
Jun KongBiomedical Informatics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Joel H SaltzBiomedical Informatics Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8322, USA.

Funding

Image Mining for Comparative Analysis of Expression Patterns in Tissue MicroarrayR01LM009239 · NLM · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI FORAN, DAVID J, SALTZ, JOEL H. · 2007 to 2016
$4.5M
Tools to Analyze Morphology and Spatially Mapped Molecular DataU24CA180924 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI SALTZ, JOEL H. · 2014 to 2019
$3.6M
Informatics for Integrative Brain Tumor Whole Slide AnalysisR01LM011119 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FORAN, DAVID J, SALTZ, JOEL H. · 2011 to 2014
$1.8M
Quantitative Analysis of GBM Invasion Mechanisms with New Imaging ProtocolK25CA181503 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KONG, JUN · 2014 to 2018
$592k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA181503NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180924NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009239NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Sensitivity analysis and parameter tuning are important processes in large-scale image analysis. They are very costly because the image analysis workflows are required to be executed several times to systematically correlate output variations with parameter changes or to tune parameters. An integrated solution with minimum user interaction that uses effective methodologies and high performance computing is required to scale these studies to large imaging datasets and expensive analysis workflows. Results: The experiments with two segmentation workflows show that the proposed approach can (i) quickly identify and prune parameters that are non-influential; (ii) search a small fraction (about 100 points) of the parameter search space with billions to trillions of points and improve the quality of segmentation results (Dice and Jaccard metrics) by as much as 1.42× compared to the results from the default parameters; (iii) attain good scalability on a high performance cluster with several effective optimizations. Conclusions: Our work demonstrates the feasibility of performing sensitivity analyses, parameter studies and auto-tuning with large datasets. The proposed framework can enable the quantification of error estimations and output variations in image segmentation pipelines. Availability and Implementation: Source code: https://github.com/SBU-BMI/region-templates/ . Contact: teodoro@unb.br. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID28062445
PMCPMC5409344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.