Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28061904›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2017

Classifying high-risk versus very high-risk prostate cancer: is it relevant to outcomes of conformal radiotherapy and androgen deprivation?

Akram Saad, Jeffrey Goldstein, Yaacov R Lawrence, Benjamin Spieler, Raya Leibowitz-Amit, Raanan Berger, Tima Davidson, Damien Urban, Lev Tsang, Dror Alezra and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Combined-modalityWorld journal of urology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer | Opinion: NO.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Akram SaadDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Jeffrey GoldsteinDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Yaacov R LawrenceDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Benjamin SpielerDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Raya Leibowitz-AmitMedical Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Hashomer, 52621, Israel.
Raanan BergerMedical Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Hashomer, 52621, Israel.
Tima DavidsonNuclear Medicine, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Hashomer, 52621, Israel.
Damien UrbanMedical Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Hashomer, 52621, Israel.
Lev TsangDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Dror AlezraDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Ilana WeissDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Zvi SymonDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Ramat Gan, Israel. Zvi.Symon@sheba.health.gov.il.
Tel Aviv University · ILSheba Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate outcomes in prostate cancer patients classified as high-risk (HR) or very high-risk (VHR) who were treated with conformal radiation therapy (CRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

methodsBetween 11/2001 and 3/2012, 203 patients with HR disease received CRT to the prostate (78-82 Gy) and pelvic lymph nodes (46-50 Gy) with ADT (6 m-2 years). Median follow-up was 50 months (12 m-142 m). Biochemical failure was defined according to Phoenix definition. Imaging studies were used to identify local, regional or metastatic failure. Four different VHR/HR groupings were formed using the 2014 and revised 2015 NCCN guidelines. Differences were examined using Kaplan Meier (KM) estimates with log rank test and uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis (MVA).

resultsFailure occurred in 30/203 patients (15%). Median time to failure was 30 m (4 m-76 m). KM estimate of 4 year biochemical disease free survival (b-DFS) for the entire cohort was 87% (95%CI: 82-92%). Four year KM survival estimates for b-DFS, PCSS and OS were comparable for each NCCN subgroup. On univariate analysis, the NCCN subgroups were not predictive of b-DFS at 4 years, however, DMFS was worse for both VHR subgroups (p = .03and .01) respectively. Cox univariate analysis was also significant for: PSA ≥40 ng/ml p = 0.001; clinical stages T2c p = .004, T3b p = .02 and > 4 cores with Gleason score 8-10 p < .03. On MVA, only PSA ≥ 40 ng/ml was predictive for b-DFS or MFS at 4 years (HR: 3.75 and 3.25, p < 0.005).

conclusionPatients with HR and VHR disease treated with CRT and ADT had good outcomes. Stratification into HR and VHR sub-groups provided no predictive value. Only PSA ≥40 ng/ml predicted poor outcomes on MVA. Distant failure was dominant and local recurrence rare, suggesting that improved systemic treatment rather than intensification of local therapy is needed. Patients with high-risk prostate cancer are most often treated with conformal dose escalated radiation therapy with androgen deprivation. Stratification into high versus very high-risk subgroups using 2014 or revised 2015 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria did not impact treatment outcomes. Only Prostate Serum Antigen (PSA) ≥40 ng/ml was predictive of poor prognosis. Distant failure was dominant and local recurrence uncommon which challenges the notion that intensification of local therapy will further improve outcomes in patients with high-risk disease.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAndrogen AntagonistsChemoradiotherapyHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, ConformalRiskTreatment OutcomeAndrogen Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID28061904
PMCPMC5216523
OpenAlexW2568568733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.