Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28061425›Full record

ArticleChemosphere2017

Fibrillar vs crystalline nanocellulose pulmonary epithelial cell responses: Cytotoxicity or inflammation?

Autumn L Menas, Naveena Yanamala, Mariana T Farcas, Maria Russo, Sherri Friend, Philip M Fournier, Alexander Star, Ivo Iavicoli, Galina V Shurin, Ulla B Vogel and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemosphere, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Nanocelluloses - Nanotoxicology, Safety Aspects and 3D Bioprinting.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Recent Progress on Cellulose-Based Ionic Compounds for Biomaterials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Autumn L MenasExposure Assessment Branch/NIOSH/CDC, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Naveena YanamalaExposure Assessment Branch/NIOSH/CDC, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Mariana T FarcasExposure Assessment Branch/NIOSH/CDC, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Maria RussoInstitute of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Sherri FriendPathology & Physiology Research Branch/NIOSH/CDC, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Philip M FournierDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alexander StarDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ivo IavicoliDepartment of Public Health, Division of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Galina V ShurinDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ulla B VogelNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bengt FadeelDivision of Molecular Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Donald BeezholdHealth Effects Laboratory Division/NIOSH/CDC, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Elena R KisinExposure Assessment Branch/NIOSH/CDC, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Anna A ShvedovaExposure Assessment Branch/NIOSH/CDC, Morgantown, WV, USA; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. Electronic address: ats1@cdc.gov.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USKarolinska Institutet · SENational Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Lung Oxidative Stress/Inflammation By Carbon NanotubesR01OH008282 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAGAN, VALERIAN E · 2005 to 2014
$2.8M
Investigations and Mitigation of Carbon Nanomaterial ToxicityR01ES019304 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STAR, ALEXANDER · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES019304NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH008282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanocellulose (NC) is emerging as a highly promising nanomaterial for a wide range of applications. Moreover, many types of NC are produced, each exhibiting a slightly different shape, size, and chemistry. The main objective of this study was to compare cytotoxic effects of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) and nanofibrillated cellulose (NCF). The human lung epithelial cells (A549) were exposed for 24 h and 72 h to five different NC particles to determine how variations in properties contribute to cellular outcomes, including cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, and cytokine secretion. Our results showed that NCF were more toxic compared to CNC particles with respect to cytotoxicity and oxidative stress responses. However, exposure to CNC caused an inflammatory response with significantly elevated inflammatory cytokines/chemokines compared to NCF. Interestingly, cellulose staining indicated that CNC particles, but not NCF, were taken up by the cells. Furthermore, clustering analysis of the inflammatory cytokines revealed a similarity of NCF to the carbon nanofibers response and CNC to the chitin, a known immune modulator and innate cell activator. Taken together, the present study has revealed distinct differences between fibrillar and crystalline nanocellulose and demonstrated that physicochemical properties of NC are critical in determining their toxicity.

Indexed as

A549 CellsCell SurvivalCelluloseCytokinesEpithelial CellsHumansInflammationLungNanofibersNanoparticlesCelluloseCytokinesCytokine productionCytoxicityLung epithelial cellsNanocelluloseOxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID28061425
PMCPMC5459363
OpenAlexW2562838990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.