Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28061319›Full record

Trial reportTelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association2017

Brief Computer-Delivered Intervention to Increase Parental Monitoring in Families of African American Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Deborah A Ellis, April Idalski Carcone, Steven J Ondersma, Sylvie Naar-King, Bassem Dekelbab, Kathleen Moltz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Developing Machine Learning Models for Behavioral Coding.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deborah A Ellis1 Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine , Detroit, Michigan.
April Idalski Carcone1 Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine , Detroit, Michigan.
Steven J Ondersma2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine , Detroit, Michigan.
Sylvie Naar-King1 Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine , Detroit, Michigan.
Bassem Dekelbab3 Department of Pediatrics, St. John Providence Health System , Detroit, Michigan.
Kathleen Moltz4 Department of Pediatrics, Promedica Toledo Children's Hospital , Toledo, Ohio.
Wayne State University · US

Funding

Computer Motivational Interventions to Improve Diabetes Care in Minority YouthR21DK089238 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ELLIS, DEBORAH A. · 2011 to 2012
$418k
NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK089238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican American adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are at elevated risk for poor diabetes management and metabolic control. Parental supervision and monitoring of adolescent diabetes management have been shown to promote better diabetes management among adolescents, but parents typically decrease their oversight during the transition to independent diabetes care.

introductionThe purpose of the study was to conduct a randomized clinical trial to test the feasibility and efficacy of a three-session, computer-delivered motivational intervention (The 3Ms) to promote increased parental monitoring among primary caregivers of young African American adolescents with T1D. The intervention was brief and optimized for delivery during routine diabetes clinic visits. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-seven adolescents with T1D aged 11-14 and their primary caregiver were randomly assigned to one of three arms: adolescent and parent motivational intervention (Arm 1), adolescent control and parent motivational intervention (Arm 2), or adolescent and parent control (Arm 3). Intervention effects were assessed 1 month after intervention completion.

resultsParents in Arm 1 and Arm 2 had significant increases in knowledge of the importance of monitoring adolescents' diabetes care. Parents in Arm 2 also had trend to significant increases in direct observation and monitoring of adolescent diabetes care, and adolescents in Arm 2 had significant improvements in glycemic control. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsFindings from the present study provide preliminary support for the efficacy of a brief, computer-delivered parenting intervention for improving family management practices and adolescent health outcomes among African American adolescents with T1D and their caregivers.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseChildComputer-Assisted InstructionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleGoalsHealth EducationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationMotivational InterviewingBlood Glucosebehavioral healtheducatione-Healthpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID28061319
PMCPMC5488253
OpenAlexW2589162313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.