Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28060936›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

Clinical Evaluation of a Royal Jelly Supplementation for the Restoration of Dry Eye: A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study and an Experimental Mouse Model.

Sachiko Inoue, Motoko Kawashima, Ryuji Hisamura, Toshihiro Imada, Yusuke Izuta, Shigeru Nakamura, Masataka Ito, Kazuo Tsubota

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Honey-Related Treatment Strategies in Dry Eye Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Therapeutic Potential of Honey and Propolis on Ocular Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Alternative therapies for dry eye disease.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sachiko InoueDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoko KawashimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryuji HisamuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihiro ImadaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke IzutaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Shigeru NakamuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Masataka ItoDevelopmental Anatomy and Regenerative Biology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Kazuo TsubotaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDry eye is a multifactorial disease characterized by ocular discomfort and visual impairment. Lacrimal gland function has been shown to decrease with aging, a known potent risk factor for dry eye. We have previously found that orally administrated royal jelly (RJ) restored tear secretion in a rat model of dry eye. METHODS AND

findingsWe examined the effects of RJ oral administration on dry eye in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Forty-three Japanese patients aged 20-60 years with subjective dry eye symptoms were randomized to an RJ group (1200 mg/tablet, six tablets daily) or a placebo group for 8 weeks. Keratoconjunctival epithelial damage, tear film break-up time, tear secretion volume, meibum grade, biochemical data, and subjective dry eye symptoms based on a questionnaire were investigated at baseline, and at 4 and 8 weeks after intervention. Adverse events were reported via medical interviews. In the RJ group, tear volume significantly increased after intervention (p = 0.0009). In particular, patients with a baseline Schirmer value of ≤10 mm showed a significant increase compared with baseline volume (p = 0.0005) and volume in the placebo group (p = 0.0051). No adverse events were reported. We also investigated the effect of RJ (300 mg/kg per day) administration using a mouse model of dry eye. Orally repeated administration of RJ preserved tear secretion, potentially through direct activation of the secretory function of the lacrimal glands.

conclusionOur results suggest that RJ improves tear volume in patients with dry eye.

trial registrationRegistered NO. the University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan (UMIN000014446).

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAcinar CellsAdultAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDry Eye SyndromesFatty AcidsHumansLacrimal ApparatusMiceMiddle AgedRoyal JellyTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultFatty AcidsRoyal Jelly

Identifiers

PMID28060936
PMCPMC5217957
OpenAlexW2569735797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.