ArticlePloS one2017
Enhancement of Microbial Biodesulfurization via Genetic Engineering and Adaptive Evolution.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sulfur source-driven global remodeling of gene expression in the fuel-biodesulfurizingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Genome-based characterization and pathway elucidation of dibenzothiophene and 4-methyldibenzothiophene desulfurization in a thiophenic compound desulfurizing Rhodococcus sp. SB1D.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Biodesulfurization enhancementHeliyon · 2025Article
- Genetic and metabolic engineering approaches for enhanced biodesulfurization of petroleum fractions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Mechanistic insights into sulfur source-driven physiological responses and metabolic reorganization in the fuel-biodesulfurizingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Searching for bacteria able to metabolize polycyclic aromatic sulfur compounds in 12-years periodically fed bioreactor.Archives of microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Deciphering the biodesulfurization potential of two novelAIMS microbiology · 2022Article
- Biodesulfurization Induces Reprogramming of Sulfur Metabolism in Rhodococcus qingshengii IGTS8: Proteomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.Microbiology spectrum · 2021Article
- Elevated c-di-GMP levels promote biofilm formation and biodesulfurization capacity of Rhodococcus erythropolis.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Article
- Comparative Analysis of Draft Genome Sequence of Rhodococcus sp. Eu-32 with Other Rhodococcus Species for Its Taxonomic Status and Sulfur Metabolism Potential.Current microbiology · 2019Article
- A new functional biofilm biocatalyst for the simultaneous removal of dibenzothiophene and quinoline usingBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Article
- Smog induces oxidative stress and microbiota disruption.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In previous work from our laboratories a synthetic gene encoding a peptide ("Sulpeptide 1" or "S1") with a high proportion of methionine and cysteine residues had been designed to act as a sulfur sink and was inserted into the dsz (desulfurization) operon of Rhodococcus erythropolis IGTS8. In the work described here this construct (dszAS1BC) and the intact dsz operon (dszABC) cloned into vector pRESX under control of the (Rhodococcus) kstD promoter were transformed into the desulfurization-negative strain CW25 of Rhodococcus qingshengii. The resulting strains (CW25[pRESX-dszABC] and CW25[pRESX-dszAS1BC]) were subjected to adaptive selection by repeated passages at log phase (up to 100 times) in minimal medium with dibenzothiophene (DBT) as sole sulfur source. For both strains DBT metabolism peaked early in the selection process and then decreased, eventually averaging four times that of the initial transformed cells; the maximum specific activity achieved by CW25[pRESX-dszAS1BC] exceeded that of CW25[pRESX-dszABC]. Growth rates increased by 7-fold (CW25[pRESX-dszABC]) and 13-fold (CW25[pRESX-dszAS1BC]) and these increases were stable. The adaptations of CW25[pRESX-dszAS1BC] were correlated with a 3-5X increase in plasmid copy numbers from those of the initial transformed cells; whole genome sequencing indicated that during its selection processes no mutations occurred to any of the dsz, S1, or other genes and promoters involved in sulfur metabolism, stress response, or DNA methylation, and that the effect of the sulfur sink produced by S1 is likely very small compared to the cells' overall cysteine and methionine requirements. Nevertheless, a combination of genetic engineering using sulfur sinks and increasing Dsz capability with adaptive selection may be a viable strategy to increase biodesulfurization ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.