Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28060757›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

LINE-1 hypomethylation status of circulating cell-free DNA in plasma as a biomarker for colorectal cancer.

Yuzo Nagai, Eiji Sunami, Yoko Yamamoto, Keisuke Hata, Satoshi Okada, Koji Murono, Koji Yasuda, Kensuke Otani, Takeshi Nishikawa, Toshiaki Tanaka and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Noninvasive Multicancer Detection Using DNA Hypomethylation of LINE-1 Retrotransposons.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuzo NagaiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Eiji SunamiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoko YamamotoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Keisuke HataDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi OkadaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji MuronoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji YasudaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kensuke OtaniDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi NishikawaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiaki TanakaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomomichi KiyomatsuDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazushige KawaiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki NozawaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Soichiro IshiharaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Dave S B HoonDepartment of Translational Molecular Medicine, Div. Molecular Oncology, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Saint John's Hospital and Health Center, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Toshiaki WatanabeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JPMolecular Oncology (United States) · USSaint John's Health Center · US

Funding

Predictive Epigenomic Biomarkers In Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving TreatmentR01CA171767 · NCI · SAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE · PI HOON, DAVE S B · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA171767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a serious public health problem and non-invasive biomarkers improving diagnosis or therapy are strongly required. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been a promising target for this purpose. In this study, we evaluated the potential of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) hypomethylation as a blood biomarker for CRC. LINE-1 hypomethylation level in plasma cfDNA in 114 CRC patients was retrospectively examined by absolute quantitative analysis of methylated alleles real-time PCR, and was expressed using LINE-1 hypomethylation index (LHI) [unmethylated copy number/ (methylated copy number + unmethylated copy number)]. Greater LHI values indicated enhanced hypomethylation. In our clinicopathological analysis, CRC patients with large tumors (≥6.0 cm), advanced N stage (≥2), and distant metastasis (M1) had statistically significantly higher cfDNA LHI than other CRC patients, suggesting cfDNA LHI as a disease progression biomarker for CRC. Furthermore, early stage I/II (n = 57) as well as advanced stage III/IV (n =57) CRC patients had significantly higher cfDNA LHI than healthy donors (n=53) [stage I/II: median 0.369 (95% confidence interval, 0.360-0.380) vs. 0.332 (0.325-0.339), P < 0.0001; stage III/IV: 0.372 (0.365-0.388) vs. 0.332 (0.325-0.339), P < 0.0001]. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that cfDNA LHI had the detection capacity of CRC with area under the curve(AUC) of 0.79 and 0.83 in stage I/II and stage III/IV CRC patients, respectively. The present study demonstrated for the first time the potential of plasma cfDNA LHI as a novel biomarker for CRC, particularly for early stage detection.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsAdultBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionDNA, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMalePrognosisBiomarkers, TumorDNA, Neoplasmcell-free DNAcolorectal cancerhypomethylationLINE-1plasma

Identifiers

PMID28060757
PMCPMC5355314
OpenAlexW2563137730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.