ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2017
A Dataset and Benchmarks for Segmentation and Recognition of Gestures in Robotic Surgery.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Untangling surgical gesture analysis-are we even speaking the same language? a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review.The British journal of surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Evolving robotic surgery training and improving patient safety, with the integration of novel technologies.World journal of urology · 2021Pooled it
- Review of surgical robotic systems for keyhole and endoscopic procedures: state of the art and perspectives.Frontiers of medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based action recognition and skill assessment in robotic cardiac surgery simulation: a feasibility study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Trial
- Robotic breast ultrasound with knowledge-guided path planning and vision feedback.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Article
- Dataset for self-practice of the peg transfer: Tool and wrist motion, eye gaze, and video measurements for multimodal skill analysis.Data in brief · 2026Article
- [Application of artificial intelligence for surgical skill assessment and quality control in minimally invasive surgery: progress, problems and prospect].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Review
- Explainable machine learning for automated robotic surgical skill assessment using rich kinematic features.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence analysis of minimally invasive surgery data.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based expert trajectory guidance in anFrontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- A Standardized Temporal Segmentation Framework and Annotation Resource Library in Robotic Surgery.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Closing the data gap: leveraging pretrained neural networks for robotic surgical assessment on limited clinical data.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The rise of robotics: Surgical approaches for rectal cancer over time.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- CRxK dataset: a multi-view surveillance video dataset for re-enacted crimes in Korea.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated assessment of simulated laparoscopic surgical skill performance using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A real-time approach for surgical activity recognition and prediction based on transformer models in robot-assisted surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Systematic review of machine learning applications using nonoptical motion tracking in surgery.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Reliability Volume: a novel metric for surgical skill evaluation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Automated performance metrics and surgical gestures: two methods for assessment of technical skills in robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveState-of-the-art techniques for surgical data analysis report promising results for automated skill assessment and action recognition. The contributions of many of these techniques, however, are limited to study-specific data and validation metrics, making assessment of progress across the field extremely challenging.
methodsIn this paper, we address two major problems for surgical data analysis: First, lack of uniform-shared datasets and benchmarks, and second, lack of consistent validation processes. We address the former by presenting the JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set (JIGSAWS), a public dataset that we have created to support comparative research benchmarking. JIGSAWS contains synchronized video and kinematic data from multiple performances of robotic surgical tasks by operators of varying skill. We address the latter by presenting a well-documented evaluation methodology and reporting results for six techniques for automated segmentation and classification of time-series data on JIGSAWS. These techniques comprise four temporal approaches for joint segmentation and classification: hidden Markov model, sparse hidden Markov model (HMM), Markov semi-Markov conditional random field, and skip-chain conditional random field; and two feature-based ones that aim to classify fixed segments: bag of spatiotemporal features and linear dynamical systems.
resultsMost methods recognize gesture activities with approximately 80% overall accuracy under both leave-one-super-trial-out and leave-one-user-out cross-validation settings.
conclusionCurrent methods show promising results on this shared dataset, but room for significant progress remains, particularly for consistent prediction of gesture activities across different surgeons. SIGNIFICANCE: The results reported in this paper provide the first systematic and uniform evaluation of surgical activity recognition techniques on the benchmark database.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.