Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28060518›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2017

In-Use Emissions and Estimated Impacts of Traditional, Natural- and Forced-Draft Cookstoves in Rural Malawi.

Roshan Wathore, Kevin Mortimer, Andrew P Grieshop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Personal Exposure Estimates via Portable and Wireless Sensing and Reporting of Particulate Pollution.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. An Expert Survey on the Material Types used to Start Cookstoves.Energy for sustainable development : the journal of the International Energy Initiative · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roshan WathoreDepartment of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7908, United States.
Kevin MortimerDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine , Liverpool L3 5QA, United Kingdom.
Andrew P GrieshopDepartment of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7908, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6470-9946

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006533/1Medical Research Council MR/L002515/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emissions from traditional cooking practices in low- and middle-income countries have detrimental health and climate effects; cleaner-burning cookstoves may provide "co-benefits". Here we assess this potential via in-home measurements of fuel-use and emissions and real-time optical properties of pollutants from traditional and alternative cookstoves in rural Malawi. Alternative cookstove models were distributed by existing initiatives and include a low-cost ceramic model, two forced-draft cookstoves (FDCS; Philips HD4012LS and ACE-1), and three institutional cookstoves. Among household cookstoves, emission factors (EF; g (kg wood)

Indexed as

Air PollutantsHousehold ArticlesCookingHumansMalawiParticulate MatterWoodAir PollutantsParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID28060518
PMCPMC5323018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.