ArticleBioethics2017
Reconfiguring Social Value in Health Research Through the Lens of Liminality.
Article in Bioethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proxies of Trustworthiness: A Novel Framework to Support the Performance of Trust in Human Health Research.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2024Article
- Reconciling fragmented sectors of health research regulation: toward an ecosystem of processual regulation.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2022Article
- Ethically designing research to inform multidimensional, rapidly evolving policy decisions: Lessons learned from the PROMISE HIV Perinatal Prevention Trial.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2021Review
- A CTSA One Health Alliance guidance on institutional review of veterinary clinical studies.BMC veterinary research · 2021Article
- Co-production and Managing Uncertainty in Health Research Regulation: A Delphi Study.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2020Article
- Biomedicine, self and society: An agenda for collaboration and engagement.Wellcome open research · 2019Article
- Research and Global Health Emergencies: On the Essential Role of Best Practice.Public health ethics · 2018Article
- Charting Regulatory Stewardship in Health Research: Making the Invisible Visible.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the growing importance of 'social value' as a central feature of research ethics, the term remains both conceptually vague and to a certain extent operationally rigid. And yet, perhaps because the rhetorical appeal of social value appears immediate and self-evident, the concept has not been put to rigorous investigation in terms of its definition, strength, function, and scope. In this article, we discuss how the anthropological concept of liminality can illuminate social value and differentiate and reconfigure its variegated approaches. Employing liminality as a heuristic encourages a reassessment of how we understand the mobilization of 'social value' in bioethics. We argue that social value as seen through the lens of liminality can provide greater clarity of its function and scope for health research. Building on calls to understand social value as a dynamic, rather than a static, concept, we emphasize the need to appraise social value iteratively throughout the entire research as something that transforms over multiple times and across multiple spaces occupied by a range of actors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.