Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28060343›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2016

Protein Complex Affinity Capture from Cryomilled Mammalian Cells.

John LaCava, Hua Jiang, Michael P Rout

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MeasuringSTAR protocols · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John LaCavaLaboratory of Cellular and Structural Biology, The Rockefeller University; Institute for Systems Genetics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University School of Medicine; jlacava@rockefeller.edu.
Hua JiangLaboratory of Cellular and Structural Biology, The Rockefeller University.
Michael P RoutLaboratory of Cellular and Structural Biology, The Rockefeller University.
Rockefeller University · USNew York University · US

Funding

TR&D Project 4. The Imaging Stage: Multiscale Spatiotemporal Modeling of Macromolecular Systems in Cellular NeighborhoodsP41GM109824 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI ROUT, MICHAEL P · 2014 to 2023
$18.8M
Training CoreP50GM107632 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BOEKE, JEF D · 2013 to 2017
$10.0M
National Resource for Mass Spectrom of Biological MacromoleculesP41GM103314 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CHAIT, BRIAN T · 2012 to 2017
$9.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103314NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM109824NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM107632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affinity capture is an effective technique for isolating endogenous protein complexes for further study. When used in conjunction with an antibody, this technique is also frequently referred to as immunoprecipitation. Affinity capture can be applied in a bench-scale and in a high-throughput context. When coupled with protein mass spectrometry, affinity capture has proven to be a workhorse of interactome analysis. Although there are potentially many ways to execute the numerous steps involved, the following protocols implement our favored methods. Two features are distinctive: the use of cryomilled cell powder to produce cell extracts, and antibody-coupled paramagnetic beads as the affinity medium. In many cases, we have obtained superior results to those obtained with more conventional affinity capture practices. Cryomilling avoids numerous problems associated with other forms of cell breakage. It provides efficient breakage of the material, while avoiding denaturation issues associated with heating or foaming. It retains the native protein concentration up to the point of extraction, mitigating macromolecular dissociation. It reduces the time extracted proteins spend in solution, limiting deleterious enzymatic activities, and it may reduce the non-specific adsorption of proteins by the affinity medium. Micron-scale magnetic affinity media have become more commonplace over the last several years, increasingly replacing the traditional agarose- and Sepharose-based media. Primary benefits of magnetic media include typically lower non-specific protein adsorption; no size exclusion limit because protein complex binding occurs on the bead surface rather than within pores; and ease of manipulation and handling using magnets.

Indexed as

Chromatography, AffinityAnimalsAntibodiesHumansMacromolecular SubstancesMass SpectrometryProtein BindingProteinsAntibodiesMacromolecular SubstancesProteins

Identifiers

PMID28060343
PMCPMC5226390
OpenAlexW2559839830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.