Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28059814›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2016

Work-related barriers, facilitators, and strategies of breast cancer survivors working during curative treatment.

Wenjun Sun, Karen Chen, Abigail Terhaar, Douglas A Wiegmann, Susan M Heidrich, Amye J Tevaarwerk, Mary E Sesto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Experiences of women with breast cancer while working or returning to work: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. From treatment to return to work in chilean breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Informing the development of multidisciplinary interventions to help breast cancer patients return to work: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Unmet needs and problems related to employment and working as reported by survivors with metastatic breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenjun SunDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Karen ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Abigail TerhaarTrace Research and Development Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Douglas A WiegmannDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Susan M HeidrichSchool of Nursing, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Amye J TevaarwerkUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Mary E SestoDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (UW-Madison)KL2RR025012 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$11.1M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR000428 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$6.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000428NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch has identified barriers and facilitators affecting cancer survivors' return to work (RTW) following the end of active treatment (surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy). However, few studies have focused on barriers and facilitators that cancer survivors experience while working during active treatment. Strategies used by cancer survivors to solve work-related problems during active treatment are underexplored.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe factors that impact, either positively or negatively, breast cancer survivors' work activities during active treatment.

methodsSemi-structured, recorded interviews were conducted with 35 breast cancer survivors who worked during active treatment. Transcripts of interviews were analyzed using inductive content analysis to identify themes regarding work-related barriers, facilitators and strategies.

resultsBarriers identified included symptoms, emotional distress, appearance change, time constraints, work characteristics, unsupportive supervisors and coworkers, family issues and other illness. Facilitators included positive aspects of work, support outside of work, and coworker and supervisor support. Strategies included activities to improve health-related issues and changes to working conditions and tasks.

conclusionsBreast cancer survivors encounter various barriers during active treatment. Several facilitators and strategies can help survivors maintain productive work activities.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsEmploymentFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchReturn to WorkSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsTherapeuticsaccommodationcancer survivorContent analysistechnology and toolsworking during active treatment

Identifiers

PMID28059814
PMCPMC5571641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.