Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28059653›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery2017

Sulforaphane suppresses the growth of glioblastoma cells, glioblastoma stem cell-like spheroids, and tumor xenografts through multiple cell signaling pathways.

Khadijeh Bijangi-Vishehsaraei, M Reza Saadatzadeh, Haiyan Wang, Angie Nguyen, Malgorzata M Kamocka, Wenjing Cai, Aaron A Cohen-Gadol, Stacey L Halum, Jann N Sarkaria, Karen E Pollok and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Khadijeh Bijangi-Vishehsaraei1Indiana University Simon Cancer Center.
M Reza Saadatzadeh1Indiana University Simon Cancer Center.
Haiyan Wang1Indiana University Simon Cancer Center.
Angie Nguyen1Indiana University Simon Cancer Center.
Malgorzata M Kamocka5Indiana Center for Biological Microscopy, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Wenjing Cai1Indiana University Simon Cancer Center.
Aaron A Cohen-Gadol3Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine and Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine.
Stacey L Halum6Purdue University and the Voice Clinic of Indiana, Lafayette, Indiana; and.
Jann N Sarkaria7Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Karen E Pollok1Indiana University Simon Cancer Center.
Ahmad R Safa1Indiana University Simon Cancer Center.
Indiana University · USIndiana University School of MedicineMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and Metastasis ProgramP30CA082709 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI Sara K Quinney · 1999 to 2026
$59.3M
Dual Targeting of DNA Repair and p53 pathways for treatment of brain cancerR01CA138798 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI POLLOK, KAREN ELIZABETH · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Role of Proteinase-3 in Apoptosis and Drug ResistanceR01CA101743 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAFA, AHMAD R · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA082709NCI NIH HHS R01 CA101743NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Defects in the apoptotic machinery and augmented survival signals contribute to drug resistance in glioblastoma (GBM). Moreover, another complexity related to GBM treatment is the concept that GBM development and recurrence may arise from the expression of GBM stem cells (GSCs). Therefore, the use of a multifaceted approach or multitargeted agents that affect specific tumor cell characteristics will likely be necessary to successfully eradicate GBM. The objective of this study was to investigate the usefulness of sulforaphane (SFN)-a constituent of cruciferous vegetables with a multitargeted effect-as a therapeutic agent for GBM. METHODS The inhibitory effects of SFN on established cell lines, early primary cultures, CD133-positive GSCs, GSC-derived spheroids, and GBM xenografts were evaluated using various methods, including GSC isolation and the sphere-forming assay, analysis of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis, cell growth inhibition assay, comet assays for assessing SFN-triggered DNA damage, confocal microscopy, Western blot analysis, and the determination of in vivo efficacy as assessed in human GBM xenograft models. RESULTS SFN triggered the significant inhibition of cell survival and induced apoptotic cell death, which was associated with caspase 3 and caspase 7 activation. Moreover, SFN triggered the formation of mitochondrial ROS, and SFN-triggered cell death was ROS dependent. Comet assays revealed that SFN increased single- and double-strand DNA breaks in GBM. Compared with the vehicle control cells, a significantly higher amount of γ-H2AX foci correlated with an increase in DNA double-strand breaks in the SFN-treated samples. Furthermore, SFN robustly inhibited the growth of GBM cell-induced cell death in established cell cultures and early-passage primary cultures and, most importantly, was effective in eliminating GSCs, which play a major role in drug resistance and disease recurrence. In vivo studies revealed that SFN administration at 100 mg/kg for 5-day cycles repeated for 3 weeks significantly decreased the growth of ectopic xenografts that were established from the early passage of primary cultures of GBM10. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that SFN is a potent anti-GBM agent that targets several apoptosis and cell survival pathways and further preclinical and clinical studies may prove that SFN alone or in combination with other therapies may be potentially useful for GBM therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticarcinogenic AgentsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDNA DamageGlioblastomaHumansIsothiocyanatesMiceNeoplastic Stem CellsOxidative StressReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionSulfoxidesAnticarcinogenic AgentsIsothiocyanatesReactive Oxygen SpeciessulforaphaneSulfoxidesapoptosiscancer stem cellsCCCP = carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazoneDMSO = dimethyl sulfoxideDSB = double-strand breakEGF = epidermal growth factorFACS = fluorescence-activated cell sortingFGF = fibroblast growth factorGBM = glioblastomaglioblastomaGSC = glioblastoma stem cellIC50 = 50% inhibition of cell survivalMRC = mitochondrial respiratory chainMSC = mesenchymal stromal cellNAC = N-acetylcysteineNSG = nonobese diabetic scid gammaoncologyPE = phycoerythrinROS = reactive oxygen speciesSFN = sulforaphaneSSB = single-strand breaksulforaphane

Identifiers

PMID28059653
PMCPMC6086125
OpenAlexW2571519106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.