Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28059621›Full record

ReviewThe neuroradiology journal2017

Imaging of sialadenitis.

Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek, Suresh Mukherji

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The neuroradiology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Canine bilateral zygomatic sialadenitis: 20 cases (2000-2019).The Journal of small animal practice · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Approach to sialadenitis.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sialography: a pictorial review.Oral radiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Submandibular Gland Tuberculosis: A Literature Review and Update.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology , Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Egypt.
Suresh Mukherji2 Department of Radiology, Michigan State University, USA.
Mansoura University · EGMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sialadenitis is an inflammation or infection of the salivary glands that may affect the parotid, submandibular and small salivary glands. Imaging findings vary among unilateral or bilateral salivary gland enlargement, atrophy, abscess, ductal dilation, cysts, stones and calcification. Imaging can detect abscess in acute bacterial suppurative sialadenitis, ductal changes with cysts in chronic adult and juvenile recurrent parotitis. Imaging is sensitive for detection of salivary stones and stricture in obstructive sialadenitis. Immunoglobulin G4-sialadenitis appears as bilateral submandibular gland enlargement. Imaging is helpful in staging and surveillance of patients with Sjögren's syndrome. Correlation of imaging findings with clinical presentation can aid diagnosis of granulomatous sialadenitis. Post-treatment sialadenitis can occur after radiotherapy, radioactive iodine or surgery.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingAlgorithmsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansRisk FactorsSialadenitisParotidsalivarysialadenitisSjögren’sstonesubmandibular

Identifiers

PMID28059621
PMCPMC5480791
OpenAlexW2569602447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.