Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28059475›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2017

Reducing uncertainty when using knee-specific finite element models by assessing the effect of input parameters.

Hongqiang Guo, Thomas J Santner, Amy L Lerner, Suzanne A Maher

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meniscal repair: The current state and recent advances in augmentation.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. In Pursuit of Quantifying Patient Knee Contact Mechanics: Finite Element Model Validation of Cadaveric Knees in Axially Loaded MRI Scans.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Reproducibility in modeling and simulation of the knee: Academic, industry, and regulatory perspectives.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hongqiang GuoDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, 10021.
Thomas J SantnerDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210.
Amy L LernerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 14627.
Suzanne A MaherDepartment of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, 10021.
Hospital for Special Surgery · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Mechanobiological Risk Factors for Initiation of Post Traumatic OsteoarthritisR01AR066635 · NIAMS · HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY · PI MAHER, SUZANNE A., TORZILLI, PETER A · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
Designing a meniscal substitute through an integrated experimental computationalR01AR057343 · NIAMS · HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY · PI MAHER, SUZANNE A. · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR057343NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR066635
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about knee-specific factors that influence contact mechanics. Finite Element (FE) models offer a powerful tool to study contact mechanics, but there often exists ambiguity in the exact values of the inputs (e.g., tissue properties), which can result in a range of output values. Our objective was to quantify the reduction in the range of output values (defined herein as "uncertainty") from FE models of the human knee joint when known pre-defined values are used for clinically measurable inputs. To achieve this goal, we applied a statistically augmented FE approach to three human cadaveric knees for which full geometric and kinematic data were available. Two sets of conditions were simulated: All model inputs, clinically measurable or not, were varied to represent a "normal" patient population (Condition 1); subsets of clinically measurable variable inputs were fixed at specific values (called "patient derived inputs," or PDIs) while the other variables were varied over "normal" values (Condition 2). We found that by fixing body mass index and the anterior-posterior position of the meniscal-bony insertion points, model output uncertainty was reduced by one- to three-fifths. The magnitude of uncertainty reduction was strongly influenced by the individual knee. It was observed that knees with great anterior-posterior translation during gait had greater reductions in uncertainty when PDIs were used. This study represents the first step in developing FE models of the human knee joint based on inputs that can be derived from patients in a clinical setting. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2233-2242, 2017.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisAdultFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedUncertaintyfinite element analysiskneeKriging predictionmeniscussubject-specific

Identifiers

PMID28059475
PMCPMC5500444
OpenAlexW2570157108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.