Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28059147›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

An on-chip imaging droplet-sorting system: a real-time shape recognition method to screen target cells in droplets with single cell resolution.

Mathias Girault, Hyonchol Kim, Hisayuki Arakawa, Kenji Matsuura, Masao Odaka, Akihiro Hattori, Hideyuki Terazono, Kenji Yasuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Measuring cell deformation by microfluidics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Droplet Microfluidics for Microbial Biotechnology.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  17. Acoustofluidic Droplet Sorter Based on Single Phase Focused Transducers.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mathias GiraultFrench National Center for Scientific Research, Bordeaux, CRPP, UPR 8641, Pessac, 33600, France.
Hyonchol KimBiomedical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba 305-8565, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hisayuki ArakawaDepartment of Ocean Sciences, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Tokyo 108-8477, Japan.
Kenji MatsuuraWaseda Bioscience Research Institute in Singapore (WABIOS), 11 Biopolis Way, Helios 138667, Singapore/3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan.
Masao OdakaWaseda Bioscience Research Institute in Singapore (WABIOS), 11 Biopolis Way, Helios 138667, Singapore/3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan.
Akihiro HattoriWaseda Bioscience Research Institute in Singapore (WABIOS), 11 Biopolis Way, Helios 138667, Singapore/3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan.
Hideyuki TerazonoWaseda Bioscience Research Institute in Singapore (WABIOS), 11 Biopolis Way, Helios 138667, Singapore/3-4-1 Okubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan.
Kenji YasudaDepartment of Physics, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A microfluidic on-chip imaging cell sorter has several advantages over conventional cell sorting methods, especially to identify cells with complex morphologies such as clusters. One of the remaining problems is how to efficiently discriminate targets at the species level without labelling. Hence, we developed a label-free microfluidic droplet-sorting system based on image recognition of cells in droplets. To test the applicability of this method, a mixture of two plankton species with different morphologies (Dunaliella tertiolecta and Phaeodactylum tricornutum) were successfully identified and discriminated at a rate of 10 Hz. We also examined the ability to detect the number of objects encapsulated in a droplet. Single cell droplets sorted into collection channels showed 91 ± 4.5% and 90 ± 3.8% accuracy for D. tertiolecta and P. tricornutum, respectively. Because we used image recognition to confirm single cell droplets, we achieved highly accurate single cell sorting. The results indicate that the integrated method of droplet imaging cell sorting can provide a complementary sorting approach capable of isolating single target cells from a mixture of cells with high accuracy without any staining.

Indexed as

Cell ShapeCell SeparationDiatomsMicrofluidicsOptical ImagingVolvocida

Identifiers

PMID28059147
PMCPMC5216404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.